From Culture 1.0 to Culture 3.0: Three Socio-Technical Regimes of Social and Economic Value Creation through Culture, and Their Impact on European Cohesion Policies

Sacco, Pier Luigi; Ferilli, Guido; Blessi, Giorgio Tavano

doi:10.3390/su10113923

Cited by 66 publications

(72 citation statements)

References 135 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A person's decision-making process is dependent on their cultural background according to what is considered 'the right way', highlighting the importance of culture [27]. As a collection of group consciousnesses, the guiding role of culture in society has become increasingly prominent [28,29], especially in the management of enterprises and organizations [30][31][32]. Therefore, theoretical research focusing on cultural perspectives has significantly improved in the field of management [33][34][35].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Project Culture: A New Project Management Culture to Promote the Sustainable Development of Organizations

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With economic development and globalization, more organizations have been cooperating with foreign enterprises, which brings not only opportunities but also management difficulties and competitions with organizations. Organizations must improve their management and adapt to changing market conditions and the requirements and needs of its customers to maintain and strengthen its position in the market. Management by Project (MBP) uses technical methods of modern project management (PM) to manage various tasks and activities that are considered as projects. It is an effective way to solve management problems and improve management levels and enterprise competitiveness. However, few small and medium-sized enterprises apply MBP in their operation and management processes. Therefore, this paper presents a new idea to promote the application of MBP and the formation of a PM culture within society. In this paper, we searched a major database using the systematic literature review method and analyzed the articles directly or indirectly linked to our paper to obtain literature supporting the views of this article. First, this paper presents a new kind of management culture from the social aspect, termed as Social Project Culture (SPC), which can promote sustainable development and improve the management level and efficiency of organizations by promoting MBP application across society. Second, by analyzing the SPC definition, its three functions, i.e., project management behavior, management and risk control capacity, and international competitiveness, are provided. Then, to help organizations apply this method, an evolutionary path is proposed, including the creation stage, formative stage, mature stage, and heritage stage. Finally, to ensure the continued optimization of SPC, four safeguard measures in terms of theory, institution, behavior, and ideology are proposed.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Project Culture: A New Project Management Culture to Promote the Sustainable Development of Organizations

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Online social networks provide a rich laboratory for the analysis of large-scale social interaction and of their social effects 1 – 4 . They facilitate the inclusive engagement of new actors by removing most barriers to participate in content-sharing platforms characteristic of the pre-digital era 5 . For this reason, they can be regarded as a social arena for public debate and opinion formation, with potentially positive effects on individual and collective empowerment 6 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of dismantling strategies on moderated vs. unmoderated online social platforms

Artime

d’Andrea

Gallotti

et al. 2020

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Online social networks are the perfect test bed to better understand large-scale human behavior in interacting contexts. Although they are broadly used and studied, little is known about how their terms of service and posting rules affect the way users interact and information spreads. Acknowledging the relation between network connectivity and functionality, we compare the robustness of two different online social platforms, Twitter and Gab, with respect to banning, or dismantling, strategies based on the recursive censor of users characterized by social prominence (degree) or intensity of inflammatory content (sentiment). We find that the moderated (Twitter) vs. unmoderated (Gab) character of the network is not a discriminating factor for intervention effectiveness. We find, however, that more complex strategies based upon the combination of topological and content features may be effective for network dismantling. Our results provide useful indications to design better strategies for countervailing the production and dissemination of antisocial content in online social platforms.

show abstract

“…In a sense, then, our comparative reading of Weber vs. Gramsci is an instantiation of the dilemma of imagining the possibility of social change through an engineered process of more or less benevolent manipulation that appeals to the instrumental rationality of humans, or as an emergent process of social mobilization around a collective urge of, and capacity for, sense-making, which is today driven by an unprecedented possibility of massive, decentralized production of cultural content-a scenario that Gramsci would have probably welcomed [47]. We do not think that this dilemma should be seen as an either-or alternative.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimism of the Will. Antonio Gramsci Takes in Max Weber

Sommer

Sacco

2019

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Responding to Max Weber's dour predictions, we enlist Antonio Gramsci's optimism to suggest how culture can spike development. Weber's sociological focus took culture to mean shared beliefs and practices. As a culture that derives from the Protestant Ethic, capitalism waged a "war on pleasure." Weber warned that this unfeeling rationality would generate an "iron cage" to trap our humanity, but his book has been read, paradoxically, as a manual for the lock down. Gramsci, on the contrary, understood culture in its humanistic sense, as a field of aesthetic pleasure, innovation, and debate. For him, a precondition for transformational social change was the broad engagement of masses as empowered collectives (Weber favored charismatic leaders); and pleasure in idiosyncratic forms of artistic as well as rooted expression was the fuel for participating in personal and shared advances. This pleasure in art and collective interpretation contrasts with the exclusionary rituals of commodified pleasure typical of capitalist consumerism. Gramsci's confidence in the transformational role of creative culture provides a framework for understanding a new wave of inclusive artistic practices that originate in the Global South and that revive the arts as vehicles for active citizenship. Participatory art can re-enchant today's sorely disenchanted socio-cultural world of mature capitalism.

show abstract

From Culture 1.0 to Culture 3.0: Three Socio-Technical Regimes of Social and Economic Value Creation through Culture, and Their Impact on European Cohesion Policies

Cited by 66 publications

References 135 publications

Social Project Culture: A New Project Management Culture to Promote the Sustainable Development of Organizations

Social Project Culture: A New Project Management Culture to Promote the Sustainable Development of Organizations

Effectiveness of dismantling strategies on moderated vs. unmoderated online social platforms

Optimism of the Will. Antonio Gramsci Takes in Max Weber

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About