2011
DOI: 10.1144/sp360.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From crystal to crustal: petrofabric-derived seismic modelling of regional tectonics

Abstract: Abstract:The Nanga Parbat Massif (NPM), Pakistan Himalaya, is an exhumed tract of Indian continental crust and represents an area of active crustal thickening and exhumation. While the most effective way to study the NPM at depth is through seismic imaging, interpretation depends upon knowledge of the seismic properties of the rocks. Gneissic, 'mylonitic' and cataclastic rocks emplaced at the surface were sampled as proxies for lithologies and fabrics currently accommodating deformation at depth. Mineral cryst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an increase in foliation intensity towards the fault core. The faster foliation-parallel velocities are controlled by the alignment of the platy phyllosilicate minerals (Lloyd et al, 2011b, a). Higher foliation-parallel permeability compared to flow perpendicular, as measured in the GTS samples, has been measured in previous studies (e.g., Faulkner and Rutter, 1998;Leclère et al, 2015;Wibberley and Shimamoto, 2003;Uehara and Shimamoto, 2004).…”
Section: Shear Zone Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…There is an increase in foliation intensity towards the fault core. The faster foliation-parallel velocities are controlled by the alignment of the platy phyllosilicate minerals (Lloyd et al, 2011b, a). Higher foliation-parallel permeability compared to flow perpendicular, as measured in the GTS samples, has been measured in previous studies (e.g., Faulkner and Rutter, 1998;Leclère et al, 2015;Wibberley and Shimamoto, 2003;Uehara and Shimamoto, 2004).…”
Section: Shear Zone Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Typically, ray‐tracing methods are applied at a much larger (crustal) scale, modeling a small number of internally homogeneous structures (layers), each of which may well have been assigned anisotropic properties derived from small‐scale petrofabric analysis as discussed by Lloyd et al . [, ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seismic anisotropy is commonly assumed to be dominantly affected by the petrofabrics, such as the crystallographic preferred orientation (CPO), of volumetrically significant mineral phases, such as quartz in the crust and olivine in the upper mantle [e.g., Nicolas and Christensen, 1987;Holbrook et al, 1992;Ismail and Mainprice, 1998;Tatham et al, 2008;Lloyd et al, 2011aLloyd et al, , 2011b, or less volumetrically dominant but highly anisotropic minerals like mica [Llana-Funez and Brown, 2012;Cholach et al, 2005]. A conventional method to investigate seismic anisotropy from rock samples involves the calculation of Voigt-Reuss-Hill (VRH) averages of the elastic tensor from the single crystal stiffness matrix of the rock forming minerals, weighted by CPO and modal composition [e.g., Mainprice, 1990;Mainprice and Humbert, 1993;Erdman et al, 2013;Llana-Funez et al, 2009].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[], and Lloyd et al . [, ] introduced a rock recipe configuration to address interpretation of seismic anisotropy in the ductile middle and lower crust. The premise of this methodology is to measure mineral CPO for common rock‐forming minerals present in middle and lower crust and vary their modal mineral composition, in order to explore the relative contribution to seismic anisotropy from individual minerals and the resulting strength and geometry of seismic anisotropy.…”
Section: Seismic Properties Of the Continental Crust From The Mineralmentioning
confidence: 99%