2018
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2017.2731965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Compressed Sensing to Compressed Bit-Streams: Practical Encoders, Tractable Decoders

Abstract: Compressed sensing is now established as an effective method for dimension reduction when the underlying signals are sparse or compressible with respect to some suitable basis or frame. One important, yet under-addressed problem regarding the compressive acquisition of analog signals is how to perform quantization. This is directly related to the important issues of how "compressed" compressed sensing is (in terms of the total number of bits one ends up using after acquiring the signal) and ultimately whether … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

7
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of the above is simply by induction and can be found, for example, in [19]. Our algorithm are inspired by the approach to reconstruction from noise-shaping quantized measurements used in [17] and [62] (see also [20]). We first introduce a so-called condensation operator V : C m → C p , for some p ∈ [m], defined by…”
Section: Noise-shaping Quantization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of the above is simply by induction and can be found, for example, in [19]. Our algorithm are inspired by the approach to reconstruction from noise-shaping quantized measurements used in [17] and [62] (see also [20]). We first introduce a so-called condensation operator V : C m → C p , for some p ∈ [m], defined by…”
Section: Noise-shaping Quantization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should further be noted that the numerical distortions decay much faster than the upper bound of (28). We suspect this to be due to the sub-optimal r-dependent constants in the exponent of (28), which are likely an artifact of the proof technique in [35]. Indeed, there is evidence in [35] that the correct exponent is −r/2 + 1/4 rather than −r/2 + 3/4.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suspect this to be due to the sub-optimal r-dependent constants in the exponent of (28), which are likely an artifact of the proof technique in [35]. Indeed, there is evidence in [35] that the correct exponent is −r/2 + 1/4 rather than −r/2 + 3/4. This is more in line with our numerical exerpiments but the proof of such is beyond the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, to acheive better error rates one must use more sophisticated quantization schemes. For example, in the sparse vector setting noise shaping techniques such as Σ∆ and distributed noise shaping leverage redundancy of the measurements to ensure error decay like O(m −r ) or O(β −cm ) for some parameters r ∈ N, β > 1 that depend on the quantization scheme, e.g., [4], [14]. As we will also use these schemes, we now briefly describe them.…”
Section: Arxiv:190203726v2 [Csit] 24 Apr 2019mentioning
confidence: 99%