2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-014-9814-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From collegial governance to conduct of conduct: Danish universities set free in the service of the state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensemaking is seen to be driven and accentuated by the feeling of increasing complexity or unfamiliar circumstances, which makes Danish HEIs a good place to start when exploring such processes. The Danish higher education system has in the past decades been subject to a series of comprehensive reforms, doing away with the traditionally very strong collegiate bodies, for example, the Senate, and replaced them with external majority governing boards, and abolished the elected leader system, in favour of an appointment scheme (Pinheiro and Stensaker 2014;Degn 2015;Degn and Sørensen 2015). At the same time, other reforms targeted the funding scheme, for example, by making the HEIs very dependent on external funding and by implementing a bibliometric performance measurement system, which favoured international publications in high-ranking journals (Aagaard and Mejlgaard 2012).…”
Section: Sensemaking In Danish Heisanalytical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensemaking is seen to be driven and accentuated by the feeling of increasing complexity or unfamiliar circumstances, which makes Danish HEIs a good place to start when exploring such processes. The Danish higher education system has in the past decades been subject to a series of comprehensive reforms, doing away with the traditionally very strong collegiate bodies, for example, the Senate, and replaced them with external majority governing boards, and abolished the elected leader system, in favour of an appointment scheme (Pinheiro and Stensaker 2014;Degn 2015;Degn and Sørensen 2015). At the same time, other reforms targeted the funding scheme, for example, by making the HEIs very dependent on external funding and by implementing a bibliometric performance measurement system, which favoured international publications in high-ranking journals (Aagaard and Mejlgaard 2012).…”
Section: Sensemaking In Danish Heisanalytical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contracts comprise both goals that are set by the Ministry and individual goals set by the institution (and approved by the Ministry). These development contracts are, as mentioned, a core element of the state's influence on the strategy of the institutions (Degn & Sørensen, 2015). In Norway, development contracts have only recently been introduced.…”
Section: Systemic and Institutional Commonalities And Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the internal management structures, there is also a difference between the Danish and the Norwegian higher education institutions. The collegial structure was abolished in Denmark in 2003 and replaced by a more 'managerial' and corporate-inspired model, which focuses on professional and efficient management (Degn & Sørensen, 2015). In Norway, the development has proceeded in the same direction but collegiate bodies still exist at the departmental level.…”
Section: Systemic and Institutional Commonalities And Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second was replacing the former elected managers with appointed ones. This introduced a line management model, where the board hired the vice chancellor, the vice chancellor hired the deans, and the deans hired the head of departments (Degn and Sørensen 2015). In the early 2000s, there was an increased autonomy implemented in Finland by the performance agreements between the universities and the Ministry of Education.…”
Section: National Reforms and Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%