From Business Administration to Business Creation: The Case of the Kalevala Global Business Creation School

Seppä, Marko

doi:10.22215/timreview/562

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The pace of change affects all sectors of society (university, industry, government as well as people), and this dynamic relationship is rapidly changing, which is leading to new forms of intermediaries that are highly individualized [61]. This, in turn, leads to the opportunity for innovation at different scales and under differing dynamics and delivering different outcomes [62,63].…”

Section: Intermediaries For Innovation At the University-industry-government Nexusmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Economic development [1,8,10,57,76] Economic geography [75,96] Innovation theory [7,11,15,46,49,53,54,60,62,63,70,78,90,94,110,123,[133][134][135][136] Open innovation theory [3,[35][36][37]58,62,64,67,69,97,101,113,118,125,[137][138][139][140] Innovation management theory [100,114,132] User innovation theory [141,142] Collaborative knowledge production…”

Section: Theme Theory Sub-theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Systematic Literature Review of Partnership Development at the University–Industry–Government Nexus

Burbridge

Morrison

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increasingly entrepreneurial intent of universities implies the commercialization of knowledge and innovation through the triple helix of interactions between universities, industry and government. However, there remains a lack of clarity concerning best practice partnerships for innovation. This systematic literature review (SLR) provides insights onto the development of partnerships at the university–industry–government nexus and builds on the existing top-down/bottom-up approach for the creation of intermediaries of innovation. The SLR describes the evolution of these intermediaries, which is driven both by criteria set by partners and the globalization of the knowledge economy. This SLR reveals that the partnership structure most likely to further economic and broader societal goals is the living lab with the inherent focus on open innovation and co-creation. This SLR reveals that the living lab structure (and including sustainability labs and urban living labs) is the partnership structure utilized for innovation that addresses economic, social and environmental goals. Two areas are recommended for further research. One concerns the development of a deeper understanding of the relationship between the evolution in the structures of partnerships for innovation and how it is influenced by the globalization of the economy, society and environment, and changing modes of knowledge production. The other is to better understand why the living lab approach to partnership creation is best suited to the delivery of sustainable development objectives and how this learning can be applied to other models of partnership development at the university–industry–government nexus.

show abstract

Section: Intermediaries For Innovation At the University-industry-government Nexusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Theme Theory Sub-theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Literature Review of Partnership Development at the University–Industry–Government Nexus

Burbridge

Morrison

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Notably, 10 of the 25 action research articles in the TIM Review report on research conducted through living labs. The journal's first action research article (Seppä, 2012) also addressed living labs, and the TIM Review turned out eight special issues on this theme between 2012 and 2018, indirectly boosting the numbers of recent action research articles. In a recent analysis of articles about living labs published in the journal, Westerlund, Leminen, and Rajahonka (2018) conclude that living lab articles in the TIM Review have moved from descriptions of the phenomena towards the design and management of living labs.…”

Section: The Tim Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Choosing an Outlet for Action Research: Publication Patterns in Innovation Journals

Hoppe¹

2019

TIM Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technology Innovation Management (TIM; timprogram.ca) is an international master's level program at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. It leads to a Master of Applied Science (M.A.Sc.) degree, a Master of Engineering (M.Eng.) degree, or a Master of Entrepreneurship (M.Ent.) degree. The objective of this program is to train aspiring entrepreneurs on creating wealth at the early stages of company or opportunity lifecycles. • The TIM Review is published in association with and receives partial funding from the TIM program. Academic Affiliations and Funding Acknowledgements timreview.ca Technology Innovation Management Review

show abstract

“…The second topic focuses on the ecosystems approach to living labs, and it has three subtopics: 1) regional innovation ecosystems (e.g., Viitanen, 2016), 2) global innovation ecosystems (e.g., Seppä, 2012), and 3) open innovation ecosystems (e.g., León & Martinez, 2016).…”

Section: Topic 2: Ecosystemmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Topic Modelling Analysis of Living Labs Research

Westerlund¹,

Leminen²,

Rajahonka³

2018

TIM Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

From Business Administration to Business Creation: The Case of the Kalevala Global Business Creation School

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

A Systematic Literature Review of Partnership Development at the University–Industry–Government Nexus

A Systematic Literature Review of Partnership Development at the University–Industry–Government Nexus

Choosing an Outlet for Action Research: Publication Patterns in Innovation Journals

A Topic Modelling Analysis of Living Labs Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About