From Brakeman to Booster: Policy change in Germany's <scp>EU</scp> Labour Migration Policy

Kolb, Holger

doi:10.1111/imig.12368

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 18 publications

(15 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The literature studying specific cases of MPCh has typically centered on Global-North countries, particularly in Europe and North America (e.g., Martín-Pérez and Moreno-Fuentes 2012;Kolb 2017;Laubenthal 2017;Caponio and Jones-Correa 2018). This literature frequently includes state-centered, interest group, and institutional approaches (e.g., Freeman 1995;Massey 1999;Abou-Chadi 2016), all of which see policies as a result of domestic pressures and interactions by diverse interest groups, party politics, state institutions, and public opinion (Freeman 1995;Joppke 1998;Breunig and Luedtke 2008;Hollifield, Martin and Orrenius 2014;Abou-Chadi 2016).…”

Section: Migration Policy Changementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Actors, Ideas, and International Influence: Understanding Migration Policy Change in South America

Brumat

Espinoza

2023

International Migration Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article analyzes the role of ideas, domestic actors, and international influences in migration policy change (MPCh) in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile. Building on 67 in-depth interviews with key actors in migration governance, public declarations of government representatives, and relevant legislation, we argue that the increased power of “securitist” actors within national bureaucracies shaped MPCh in all three countries. Between 2015 and 2019, these actors promoted a set of programmatic ideas and policy proposals that linked migration to security issues and distinguished between “good” and “bad” immigrants, emulating Global North countries. This set of ideas resulted in policy change at the country level, but at the same time, national-level policy change coexisted with continuity at the regional level. This article contributes to the literature on migration governance, first, by extending the geographical focus of migration policy studies, which frequently focus on party politics, coalitions, and public opinion, beyond the Global North. Second, we further current explanations of MPCh and policy contradictions by differentiating between continuity and change in programmatic ideas, policy proposals, and public philosophies. Third, we advance the regional migration policy literature by distinguishing between different groups of actors within national bureaucracies and enhancing understanding of these actors’ roles at both the national and international levels. Across its sections, this article shows that policy ideas—where and from whom they come—matter. By unpacking the different types of ideas that influence policy shifts and the actors who promote them, we can better understand apparent contradictions in migration policy.

show abstract

Section: Migration Policy Changementioning

confidence: 99%

“… 11 In March 2021, left-wing president Alberto Fernández derogated Decree 70/2017 by passing presidential Decree 128 (Poder Ejecutivo Nacional, 2021). …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%