2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From brain to movement: Wearables-based motion intention prediction across the human nervous system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its maximum regulation times remain in the range of 20-200 ms for 17 out of 18 cases (it is 360 ms only in case 5). These results are comparable to the reaction times obtained for EMG-based systems (130-300 ms) [ 38 41 ] and significantly better than the low-cost force sensor’s performance (410-1280 ms) [ 42 , 43 ]. However, the results are worse in most cases than for the ultrasensitive pressure sensors (43 ms) [ 44 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its maximum regulation times remain in the range of 20-200 ms for 17 out of 18 cases (it is 360 ms only in case 5). These results are comparable to the reaction times obtained for EMG-based systems (130-300 ms) [ 38 41 ] and significantly better than the low-cost force sensor’s performance (410-1280 ms) [ 42 , 43 ]. However, the results are worse in most cases than for the ultrasensitive pressure sensors (43 ms) [ 44 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Nevertheless, the proposed method does not increase the costs of the exoskeleton by adding EMG measuring systems or expensive sensors [ 38 41 , 44 ]. Neither does it increase the mass and bulkiness of the structure as for the budget force sensors [ 42 , 43 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[289] Researchers are continually exploring the specifics of natural neuronal pulses, and more precise instruments are consistently being developed. [290] It is known that most neuronal signal pulses range from 0.1 to 100 Hz. Gradually increasing pulse frequencies and reducing durations at different recovery stages can better facilitate neural recovery.…”
Section: Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In myoelectric control systems, sEMG signals are used to decipher the user's movement intentions, serving as input to control prosthetic limbs or exoskeletons 16 . The sEMG signal is generated approximately 80 ms before motion is exerted, primarily due to the electromechanical delay (EMD) inherent in these signals 17,18 . This characteristic allows myoelectric control systems to deliver timely assistance with reduced delays.…”
Section: Challenges Of Myoelectric Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%