2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From bottle to microplastics: Can we estimate how our plastic products are breaking down?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, similar surface degradation, cracking, and attached fragments were found in field experiments. 84,85 As another example, the applied sonication describes a worst-case scenario for mechanical abrasion compared to environmental mechanical stresses; 86 supports that dry UV aging leads to crack formation and in consequence to fragment formation, before any mechanical treatment is applied. 69 These previously formed fragments can be released (i.e., sampled) by any mechanical treatment, and in fact earlier NanoRelease studies compared shear-free immersion to gentle shaking to ultrasonication and found that shaking or sonication induced comparable fragment release rates, and also shear-free immersion was found to be in the same order of magnitude.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, similar surface degradation, cracking, and attached fragments were found in field experiments. 84,85 As another example, the applied sonication describes a worst-case scenario for mechanical abrasion compared to environmental mechanical stresses; 86 supports that dry UV aging leads to crack formation and in consequence to fragment formation, before any mechanical treatment is applied. 69 These previously formed fragments can be released (i.e., sampled) by any mechanical treatment, and in fact earlier NanoRelease studies compared shear-free immersion to gentle shaking to ultrasonication and found that shaking or sonication induced comparable fragment release rates, and also shear-free immersion was found to be in the same order of magnitude.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MPs have recently been found in human lungs, placentas, and blood . Their general toxicity and overall impact on health are difficult to assess due to variability in their chemical makeup, size, origins, and degradation pathways over time. , MPs can be classified as primary when they are released into the environment as submillimeter-sized particles, for example, from commercial products in cosmetics, tires, and textiles. , Conversely, secondary MPs are formed from the breakdown of larger plastic waste . Both primary and secondary MPs can be anticipated to undergo physical and chemical changes when released in the environment. , However, there is a significant lack of understanding of the effect of parameters such as heat or sunlight irradiance on the physical properties of MPs that determine their long-term fate and interaction with the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 Conversely, secondary MPs are formed from the breakdown of larger plastic waste. 23 Both primary and secondary MPs can be anticipated to undergo physical and chemical changes when released in the environment. 24,25 However, there is a significant lack of understanding of the effect of parameters such as heat or sunlight irradiance on the physical properties of MPs that determine their long-term fate and interaction with the environment.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 24 days of shaking, the overall composition of α-synuclein fibrils under TEM is similar between nanoplastic-contaminated and nanoplastic-free reactions. To confirm that environmentally derived polystyrene nanoplastic, which differs in surface coarseness from smoother engineered polystyrene nanoplastics ( 7 ), has a similar effect, we produced nanoplastics from single-use red Solo-brand polystyrene plastic cups following National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) guidelines ( 27 , 28 ). These particles, with a size distribution of 115.6 ± 34.3 nm diameter, have a similar nucleating effect on α-synuclein fibrils (fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%