2022
DOI: 10.5195/names.2022.2364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Bonehead to @realDonaldTrump

Abstract: In many online services, we are identified by self-chosen usernames, also known as nicknames or pseudonyms. Usernames have been studied quite extensively within several academic disciplines, yet few existing literature reviews or meta-analyses provide a comprehensive picture of the name category. This article addresses this gap by thoroughly analyzing 103 research articles with usernames as their primary focus. Despite the great variety of approaches taken to investigate usernames, three main types of studies … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the introduction of the first available names for odonates by Linnaeus in 1758, about 23% of dragonfly and damselfly species have been baptized honoring individuals (Hämäläinen, 2016). This practice has increased dramatically over the last 30 years, accounting for 40 to 45% of all names for odonates introduced within this period (Hämäläinen, 2016(Hämäläinen, , 2021), which appears to be significantly higher than the average for other metazoans (compare with data in Ceríaco et al, 2023). Such a phenomenon can be explained by a variety of reasons, including egocentrism, but sometimes it appears to be related to efforts to draw more attention to the biodiversity agenda from the public.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the introduction of the first available names for odonates by Linnaeus in 1758, about 23% of dragonfly and damselfly species have been baptized honoring individuals (Hämäläinen, 2016). This practice has increased dramatically over the last 30 years, accounting for 40 to 45% of all names for odonates introduced within this period (Hämäläinen, 2016(Hämäläinen, , 2021), which appears to be significantly higher than the average for other metazoans (compare with data in Ceríaco et al, 2023). Such a phenomenon can be explained by a variety of reasons, including egocentrism, but sometimes it appears to be related to efforts to draw more attention to the biodiversity agenda from the public.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pl. AINIALA-ÖSTMAN 2017, AINIALA-JANTUNEN 2019,RAUNAMAA 2020, HÄMÄLÄINEN 2022. Az egyik legjelentősebb finn nyelvészeti kiadvány, a Virittäjä 2021-ben a 125. évfordulóját ünnepelte, amelynek alkalmából TERHI AINIALA és PAULA SJÖBLOM (2021) összegezte a folyóiratban 1897-2019 között megjelent névtani írásokat és különösen az ezekben használt módszereket.…”
unclassified