2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10472-011-9236-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From bogtrotting to herding: a UCD perspective

Abstract: Publication informationAnnals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 61 (4) Abstract. This is the third year in which a team from University College Dublin has participated in the Multi Agent Contest 1 . This paper describes the system that was created to participate in the contest, along with observations of the team's experiences in the contest. The system itself was built using the AF-TeleoReactive and AF-AgentSpeak agent programming languages running on the Agent Factory platform. A hybrid control arc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial evaluation comprised of the use and comparison of two languages created using the framework during participation in the 2010 Multi Agent Contest 4 [11]. The contest scenario consisted of developing a multi-agent system to solve a cooperative task in a dynamic environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial evaluation comprised of the use and comparison of two languages created using the framework during participation in the 2010 Multi Agent Contest 4 [11]. The contest scenario consisted of developing a multi-agent system to solve a cooperative task in a dynamic environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seventh team was UCD Bogtrotters formed by Sean Russell, Rem Collier and Mauro Dragone from University College Dublin, Ireland [29]. Their solution architecture consisted of a custom behavioural layer for the implementation of primitive capabilities and Agent Factory (AF) as the upper layer.…”
Section: Participants and Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%