2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1709.09279
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Blind deconvolution to Blind Super-Resolution through convex programming

Abstract: This paper discusses the recovery of an unknown signal x ∈ R L through the result of its convolution with an unknown filter h ∈ R L . This problem, also known as blind deconvolution, has been studied extensively by the signal processing and applied mathematics communities, leading to a diversity of proofs and algorithms based on various assumptions on the filter and its input. Sparsity of this filter, or in contrast, non vanishing of its Fourier transform are instances of such assumptions. The main result of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(124 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another related bilinear inverse problem is blind calibration via repeated measurements from multiple sensing operators [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]. Since blind calibration with repeated measurements is in principle an easier problem than BGPC [7], we believe our methods for BGPC and our theoretical analysis can be extended to this scenario.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another related bilinear inverse problem is blind calibration via repeated measurements from multiple sensing operators [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]. Since blind calibration with repeated measurements is in principle an easier problem than BGPC [7], we believe our methods for BGPC and our theoretical analysis can be extended to this scenario.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The lifting technique has been applied on a wide range of blind deconvolution and sensor calibration models [4,1,9,7,44], among which [7,44] are mostly related with our model. In [7], Chi considered a slightly different single-snapshot model:…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let n 0 := g 2 f which can be estimated from R y based on the following lemma (see Appendix B for the proof): Lemma 2. Let R y be defined in (9). Then…”
Section: Optimization Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%