From awareness to behaviour: Testing a hierarchy of effects model on the Australian Make Healthy Normal campaign using mediation analysis

Abstract

The Make Healthy Normal mass media campaign was a three-year campaign launched in 2015 in New South Wales (NSW), Australia to address community norms around overweight and obesity. It was underpinned by a hierarchy of effects model; a commonly used framework in campaigns but one that has rarely been tested. The campaign evaluation included a cohort study of NSW adults, surveyed three times over 12 months (n = 939 at Wave 3). This study tested the campaign's hierarchy of effects model, which theorized that participants would move from recognition to behaviour change via understanding, knowledge, attitude, social norms, self-efficacy, and intention, using these data. We used the moderation and mediation of effects method proposed by Baron and Kenny, adjusting for age and sex, to test for progression through the hierarchy of effects for two outcomes: physical activity and fast food consumption. We found a clear progression through the theorized model, from recognition through to behaviour change, via the intermediate variables for both outcomes. We also found several effects not predicted by the theorized model, with consistently strong associations between understanding and attitude, understanding and self-efficacy, attitude and self-efficacy, and self-efficacy and behaviour change in both outcome models. Our study provides support for the hierarchy of effects as a conceptual model in campaign planning and evaluation of social marketing campaigns. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the hierarchy between two behavioural outcomes and the consistency observed between the models adds to the potential usefulness of the hierarchy of effects.

Development of an educational intervention to reduce the burden of adult chronic lung disease in rural India: Inputs from a qualitative study

“…This is in contrast to findings from the high income countries where patients typically have a good understanding of their disease, its severity, the system involved and the prognosis [16,17]. Low awareness levels and understanding of the disease affect health seeking behaviour and/or health practices; this is often emphasised by theoretical models such as the Hierarchy of Effects Model (HOEM) which proposes that 'proximal' variables like awareness are causally linked to 'distal' variables like behaviour change through a series of intermediate measures, including social norms, attitudes and intentions [18,19]. Similarly psychological theory-based models like the Health Belief Model (HBM) and the Integrated Behaviour Model (IBM) which incorporates the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) also emphasise knowledge as a key determinant of health behaviour change [20].…”

Systematic Review of Interventions to Increase Awareness of Ultraviolet Radiation-Induced Harm and Protective Behaviors in Post-Secondary School Adults

“…Factors such as emotions and levels of knowledge and awareness significantly contribute to a person's attitude/belief formation and decisionmaking process, ultimately influencing behavior changes. [54][55][56] Using this framework, assessments of intervention efficacy typically fell in 5 domains: (1) Behavior, (2) Intention, (3) Attitudes/ Beliefs/Perception, (4) Knowledge/Awareness, and (5) Emotion/Reaction.…”

Consumers’ Behavior in Selective Waste Collection: A Case Study Regarding the Determinants from Romania

“…Wan et al [22] considered the awareness of consequences as an underlining factor for behavioral intention, but found that even though the connection was positive and significant, the influence was low. Furthermore, Kite et al [53] underlined the fact that some variables, such as awareness, are casually linked to distant outcomes such as behavior through the connection of other variables such as attitudes, social norms, intentions. Meng et al [34] included environmental awareness as part of the environmental attitudes with a direct influence on the residents' disposal behavior.…”