1993
DOI: 10.1021/cr00023a012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From atoms and bonds to three-dimensional atomic coordinates: automatic model builders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
311
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 400 publications
(315 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
311
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Deuterium atoms in several Maybridge database entries were manually changed to hydrogen atoms. Protonation of the molecules in the Maybridge database and the 250 inhibitors was performed by generating three-dimensional structures for these molecules with CORINA 26 and then applying a locally modified version of the molecular format interconversion program, Babel. 27 In this computer program, the rules for performing protonation were modified to better reflect the expected ionization state at physiological pH for functional groups including amidine, guanidinium, N-oxide, and tetrazole.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deuterium atoms in several Maybridge database entries were manually changed to hydrogen atoms. Protonation of the molecules in the Maybridge database and the 250 inhibitors was performed by generating three-dimensional structures for these molecules with CORINA 26 and then applying a locally modified version of the molecular format interconversion program, Babel. 27 In this computer program, the rules for performing protonation were modified to better reflect the expected ionization state at physiological pH for functional groups including amidine, guanidinium, N-oxide, and tetrazole.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1]. The 3D structures of the 13 000 compounds thus selected were built using CORINA (19). These structures were tested for interaction with CCR4 by using the GOLD docking program and the GoldScore fitness function (20).…”
Section: Identification Of Potential Lead Molecules Through Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were the semiempirical method AM1 18 as implemented in MOPAC93 (Software release 2002, Stewart, J. J. P.) and the ab initio method B3LYP/6-31G** as provided by the Gaussian 98 (Gaussian 98 revision A.7, Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh, PA) package. All calculations included geometry optimization, employing CORINA 2001 22,23 to generate initial 3D structures from Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry Specification (SMILES) strings, followed by SYBYL force field geometry optimizations (SYBYL version 6.8, Tripos Associates, St. Louis, MO) before starting quantum chemical calculations. 16 Because no conformational search routines were employed it may well be that, in individual cases, the finally achieved geometry does not represent the energy minimum of the conformational space.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%