Aspects of Management Planning for Cultural World Heritage Sites 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-69856-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Archaeological Site to World Heritage Site: The Emergence of Social Management at Monte Alban, Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Questions of delimiting archaeological sites according to material criteria are fundamental (Dunnell and Dancey, 1983: 271–274). At the same time, Mortensen (2007) and Robles García and Corbett (2018) draw attention specifically to the analytical productivity of examining the borders—both conceptual and literal—constitutive of archaeology, archaeological sites, and their contexts. From this spatial genealogy of borders, I will argue that dispossession resulted less from the explicit intention of state heritage management to protect the pre-Hispanic past—or from the unintended outcomes of well-meaning policies—than from longer-term and apparently unrelated processes like multicultural recognition, land reform, and archaeological research.…”
Section: Conditions For Dispossession and The Materiality Of Bordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions of delimiting archaeological sites according to material criteria are fundamental (Dunnell and Dancey, 1983: 271–274). At the same time, Mortensen (2007) and Robles García and Corbett (2018) draw attention specifically to the analytical productivity of examining the borders—both conceptual and literal—constitutive of archaeology, archaeological sites, and their contexts. From this spatial genealogy of borders, I will argue that dispossession resulted less from the explicit intention of state heritage management to protect the pre-Hispanic past—or from the unintended outcomes of well-meaning policies—than from longer-term and apparently unrelated processes like multicultural recognition, land reform, and archaeological research.…”
Section: Conditions For Dispossession and The Materiality Of Bordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of archaeological zones is to safeguard culture, traditions, and physical spaces. Mexican archeological sites are a testament to the rich cultural heritage of Mexico and its diverse indigenous communities (Golden et al 2016; Robles-García and Corbett 2018). They are essential for the preservation of history and national identity, since they provide a sense of continuity and connect the country's present to its rich cultural heritage and history, and are important for tourism—archeological sites are a major draw for tourists and are a significant source of revenue for the country (Perez-Galicia and Perez-Campuzano 2015; Oehmichen-Bazán 2018; Gallaga et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%