From analytical purposes to data visualizations: a decision process guided by a conceptual framework and eye tracking

Abstract

 Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

On the declarative paradigm in hybrid business process representations: A conceptual framework and a systematic literature study

“…In order to investigate the understandability of the proposed HBPR, the authors examined the distribution of attention on the different artifacts using a set of eye tracking fixation-based measures [88] including fixation count (i.e., number of fixations on specific area of the stimulus [86]) and total fixation duration. Furthermore, the authors identified the common reading patterns of participants following a process mining based approach proposed in [89]. With this regard, fixation data were converted to event logs, then a process discovery technique [49] was used to infer the implied attention maps.…”

Exploring how users engage with hybrid process artifacts based on declarative process models: a behavioral analysis based on eye-tracking and think-aloud

“…In the context of this study, we deploy two visualizations: attention maps and scarf-plots. Attention maps [37] are aggrega-tion of fixations over time and/or over participants [23] and are often used as an alternative for transitions matrices to capture transitions between AOIs. Unlike transition matrices that emphasize only the spatial feature of AOIs [38], attention maps consider also the ordering dependencies between AOIs.…”

Mining reading patterns from eye-tracking data: method and demonstration

“…A reading pattern depicts how users switch between different software artifacts or parts thereof. In the literature, process mining has been used to extract reading patterns already [15]. However, in that case, the setting was very "rigid" and did not allow any interaction with the software artifacts, making the entire approach unsuitable to answer questions related to code understanding (which requires navigation over several files).…”