2019
DOI: 10.1071/mf19197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From an irrigation system to an ecological asset: adding environmental flows establishes recovery of a threatened fish species

Abstract: Worldwide, riverine fish are the target of environmental water because populations have declined in lotic river habitats following river regulation. Murray cod is an endangered Australian riverine fish with remaining populations associated with lotic river reaches with instream habitat, including some creeks operated as part of irrigation systems. Our objectives were to develop a life history model, apply the building block method of environmental flows to enhance the abundance of juvenile Murray cod and promo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar approach may also be applicable in the northern MDB, where the Macintyre–Barwon and Weir rivers are confirmed spawning locations for golden perch (Reynolds, ; Rolls et al, ) and where other tributaries (Paroo, Culgoa, Warrego, Moonie, Condamine–Balonne rivers) are also likely to serve as spawning and recruitment habitats (Balcombe et al, ; Rolls et al, ). By systematically identifying important tributary habitats, local actions can be applied (Hermoso, Abell, Linke, & Boon, ; Embke et al, ; Stuart, Sharpe, Stanislawski, Parker, & Mallen‐Cooper, ), such as protecting refuge water holes and the first spring/summer flows that serve as migration or spawning cues, when there is a sharp rise from low‐flow antecedent conditions. Such actions can help maintain the natural functioning of these rivers, most notably for the downstream export of fish larvae into receiving riverine or floodplain nursery habitats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar approach may also be applicable in the northern MDB, where the Macintyre–Barwon and Weir rivers are confirmed spawning locations for golden perch (Reynolds, ; Rolls et al, ) and where other tributaries (Paroo, Culgoa, Warrego, Moonie, Condamine–Balonne rivers) are also likely to serve as spawning and recruitment habitats (Balcombe et al, ; Rolls et al, ). By systematically identifying important tributary habitats, local actions can be applied (Hermoso, Abell, Linke, & Boon, ; Embke et al, ; Stuart, Sharpe, Stanislawski, Parker, & Mallen‐Cooper, ), such as protecting refuge water holes and the first spring/summer flows that serve as migration or spawning cues, when there is a sharp rise from low‐flow antecedent conditions. Such actions can help maintain the natural functioning of these rivers, most notably for the downstream export of fish larvae into receiving riverine or floodplain nursery habitats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discharge metrics each reflected one of four time periods based on the life history of our study species and the effects of river regulation on discharge regimes in our study systems. These metrics build on previous studies of associations between discharge and recruitment for our study species (Humphries et al., 1999, 2020; King et al., 2009; Koster et al., 2017; Stuart et al., 2019; Tonkin et al., 2019, 2020). The discharge metrics were: (1) maximum 3‐day proportional change in discharge in the 12 months prior to sampling; (2) median daily discharge in September–November prior to sampling; (3) median daily discharge in December–March prior to sampling; (4) median daily discharge in May–July prior to sampling; (5) maximum daily discharge in the 12–24 months prior to sampling; and (6) the number of days in the 12 months prior to sampling with discharge below its long‐term (1991–present) 10th percentile.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Murray cod spawn annually, although the presence of gaps in numerous age classes suggests that recruitment in the lower Darling River is variable. To rebuild populations, recruitment needs to be supported by the provision of hydraulically complex, flowing water habitats at key times to support growth and survival (Tonkin et al 2017(Tonkin et al , 2021Mallen-Cooper and Zampatti 2018;Stuart et al 2019). Indeed, Murray cod are often a focal species for environmental water allocation within the MDB, and the storage and subsequent reregulation of water in the Menindee Lakes means that targeted environmental flows can be delivered to the lower Darling River to support population restoration (Koehn et al 2014;Sharpe and Stuart 2018).…”
Section: Recovery and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%