2015
DOI: 10.1215/15314200-2799244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From All Sides

Abstract: This article makes the case for expanding our conception of what it means to provide “professional training” to PhD students in departments of English. Rather than focus exclusively on placing students in tenure-track academic appointments, departments should prepare them simultaneously for careers both inside and outside the academy by focusing on the broad range of skills inherent to doctoral training. Such an approach not only will empower graduate students but also may transform the academy itself.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coordinating a community partnership program often requires difficult decisions about mediating crossinstitutional relationships; communicating effectively with community organization and campus administrators; anticipating and addressing logistical, liability, space, and funding concerns; writing and managing grants, which must be housed in a particular institution or department; negotiating transitions in anticipation of graduation; and balancing one's own labor conditions, as initiating a community partnership is often unpaid and challenging to translate into work valued by institutions beyond a "service" CV line. All of this must be accomplished within the changing landscape of higher education, which includes a pervasive neoliberal focus on revenue production that can eclipse civic engagement (Shaffer, 2012) and the swirling anxiety about publishing for job market competitiveness given the dwindling number of tenure-track positions (Ball, Gleason, & Peterson, 2015;Larson, Ghaffarzadegan, & Xue, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coordinating a community partnership program often requires difficult decisions about mediating crossinstitutional relationships; communicating effectively with community organization and campus administrators; anticipating and addressing logistical, liability, space, and funding concerns; writing and managing grants, which must be housed in a particular institution or department; negotiating transitions in anticipation of graduation; and balancing one's own labor conditions, as initiating a community partnership is often unpaid and challenging to translate into work valued by institutions beyond a "service" CV line. All of this must be accomplished within the changing landscape of higher education, which includes a pervasive neoliberal focus on revenue production that can eclipse civic engagement (Shaffer, 2012) and the swirling anxiety about publishing for job market competitiveness given the dwindling number of tenure-track positions (Ball, Gleason, & Peterson, 2015;Larson, Ghaffarzadegan, & Xue, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%