2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.12.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From a traditionally open access fishery to modern restrictions: Portuguese anglers' perceptions about newly implemented recreational fishing regulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Lloret and Font (2013) found that the average size (16.2 cm) of two-banded seabream (Diplodus vulgaris) in the harvest of shore anglers in a study area in northern Spain was under the legal MLS (18 cm), indicating that shore anglers did not follow the MLS for this species. Similarly, Veiga et al (2010) found relatively low release rates for sea bass in Portugal and a large retention of undersized fish, possibly due to the fact that many Portuguese anglers disagreed with the MLS in place for this species (36 cm) or due to a lack of awareness of the specific MLS in place (Veiga et al, 2013). Catch rates have also been shown to play an important role for certain target species as anglers become more likely to release parts of their catch if catches are high (Sullivan, 2002).…”
Section: Release Proportions and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Lloret and Font (2013) found that the average size (16.2 cm) of two-banded seabream (Diplodus vulgaris) in the harvest of shore anglers in a study area in northern Spain was under the legal MLS (18 cm), indicating that shore anglers did not follow the MLS for this species. Similarly, Veiga et al (2010) found relatively low release rates for sea bass in Portugal and a large retention of undersized fish, possibly due to the fact that many Portuguese anglers disagreed with the MLS in place for this species (36 cm) or due to a lack of awareness of the specific MLS in place (Veiga et al, 2013). Catch rates have also been shown to play an important role for certain target species as anglers become more likely to release parts of their catch if catches are high (Sullivan, 2002).…”
Section: Release Proportions and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Educational programmes have been widely recommended to increase anglers' awareness of regulations (e.g. MLS), potentially shape moral attitudes and values, increase the release proportions of undersized fish, and promote better handling and release procedures (Raakjaer Nielsen and Mathiesen, 2003;Cooke and Suski, 2005;Edison et al, 2006;Lewin et al, 2006;Smallwood and Beckley, 2012;Veiga et al, 2013). One example of improved angling practice and the importance of correct angler education in C&R fisheries is the use of circle hooks.…”
Section: Potential For Improvements In Angler Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In countries where similar regulations are less strict (e.g. Sweden, Portugal, New Zealand, Norway: Naslund et al., ; Veiga et al., ; Thomas, Milfont & Gavin, ; Lennox, Falkegård, Vøllestad, Cooke & Thorstad, ), catch and yield would be expected to show higher variability or even different patterns. Fishing grounds with no bag and slot limits could show higher variance in catch and yield.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can include additional EU mechanisms such as regulations that oblige Member States to implement sustainability plans for both small-scale professional fisheries and recreational ones, on the same lines as the largescale fisheries. Some EU Member States have implemented measures to limit recreational fisheries through harvest controls, such as daily bag limits, fishing licenses and spatial restrictions (Pawson et al, 2008;Veiga et al, 2013). Other initiatives could include the lead of fishers' organizations in decentralized approaches to manage their fisheries, a system that has proved effective in the Northwest Mediterranean (Arceo et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%