2014
DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2014.968744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From a phenomenological to a geomechanical approach to landslide hazard analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The paper briefly introduces the Pisciolo case study [5], which is representative of the deep and slow landslide processes frequently observed in the Southern Apennines (Italy) [1][2]. A fully coupled hydro-mechanical finite element analysis confirmed that cumulated rainfall infiltration is the main factor triggering the instabilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The paper briefly introduces the Pisciolo case study [5], which is representative of the deep and slow landslide processes frequently observed in the Southern Apennines (Italy) [1][2]. A fully coupled hydro-mechanical finite element analysis confirmed that cumulated rainfall infiltration is the main factor triggering the instabilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The transition soils have a clay fraction of 40-60% and are characterised by high activity (0.85 on average), low mechanical strength (c'=0 kPa and φ'=20.7° for p'<300 kPa) and high saturated permeability (k in situ >10 -9 m/s) [5,8]. Such hydro-mechanical behaviour is primarily due to the fissured meso-structure of the clay, which impoverishes the mechanical strength properties and increases the hydraulic conductivity with respect to that of the same material when unfissured [1][2][3][4][8][9][10][11]. Fissuring also affects the unsaturated soil behaviour [4,5,8], as observed when subjecting the Pisciolo clay to dryingwetting cycles, during which the suctions have been measured by means of the filter paper technique [12] and the Imperial College high capacity tensiometers [13].…”
Section: Pisciolo Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The activities at large scale are aimed at facilitating local authorities and technical officers in selecting and scheduling the most suitable structural/non-structural interventions (among the categories planned at medium scale). This can be done by analyzing and predicting the damage severity levels-by way of empirical fragility curves-pertaining to homogeneous (in terms of structural and/or foundation typologies) buildings and infrastructure covered by very high-resolution DInSAR data and interacting with slow-moving landslides typified based on their geometric and kinematic characteristics (Cotecchia et al 2016;Ferlisi et al 2018;Gullà et al 2017b;Peduto et al 2017Peduto et al , 2018.…”
Section: The Proposed Multi-scale Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design of risk mitigation measures at detailed scale (> 1:2000) requires input data of high quality and quantity. In particular, with reference to a given typified landslide, the knowledge of (1) the geometry and kinematics of the landslide, (2) the hydraulic and geotechnical properties of involved soils along with their stratigraphic asset, (3) the pluviometric characteristics of the area and the groundwater regime, is a prerequisite for the generation of a reliable geotechnical slope model and, therefore, for a correct application of limit equilibrium and/or numerical methods (e.g., Finite Elements Methods implementing suitable constitutive laws) aimed at modeling the different processes governing the slope stability (Cotecchia et al 2016;Gullà et al 2018). Once the triggering factors are known, the choice of the most suitable stabilization work can be associated with the evaluation of the increase of the factor of safety that, with respect to the occurrence of a failure mechanism, occurs in the transition from the condition of pre-to post-intervention (Ng et al 2002).…”
Section: Detailed Scalementioning
confidence: 99%