2023
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-04589-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From a genome-wide screen of RNAi molecules against SARS-CoV-2 to a validated broad-spectrum and potent prophylaxis

Abstract: Expanding the arsenal of prophylactic approaches against SARS-CoV-2 is of utmost importance, specifically those strategies that are resistant to antigenic drift in Spike. Here, we conducted a screen of over 16,000 RNAi triggers against the SARS-CoV-2 genome, using a massively parallel assay to identify hyper-potent siRNAs. We selected Ten candidates for in vitro validation and found five siRNAs that exhibited hyper-potent activity (IC50 < 20 pM) and strong blockade of infectivity in live-virus experiments. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To make the comparison as fair and uniform as possible, we compiled the results of ex vivo assessment of siRNAs against SARS-CoV-2 and flagged ‘high activity’ those siRNAs with asignificant repressive effect on viral RNA accumulation or viral plaque forming units exceeding 50% in the tested conditions (selecting conditions with siRNA concentrations close to 10 nM and post-transfection incubation close to 48 h whenever possible). The proportion of designed siRNAs with high activity ranges from 0 [ 57 , 59 ] to 10/11 [ 61 ] and 1/1 [ 55 ] (see Figure 4 ; note that siRNAs designed by [ 58 ] could not be analysed because they were tested ex vivo against SARS-CoV-2 only at a100 nM concentration). Our approach, yielding 6/8 siRNAs with high activity, proved efficient in designing potent siRNAs with apure bioinformatics approach, without requiring high-throughput experimental screening.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To make the comparison as fair and uniform as possible, we compiled the results of ex vivo assessment of siRNAs against SARS-CoV-2 and flagged ‘high activity’ those siRNAs with asignificant repressive effect on viral RNA accumulation or viral plaque forming units exceeding 50% in the tested conditions (selecting conditions with siRNA concentrations close to 10 nM and post-transfection incubation close to 48 h whenever possible). The proportion of designed siRNAs with high activity ranges from 0 [ 57 , 59 ] to 10/11 [ 61 ] and 1/1 [ 55 ] (see Figure 4 ; note that siRNAs designed by [ 58 ] could not be analysed because they were tested ex vivo against SARS-CoV-2 only at a100 nM concentration). Our approach, yielding 6/8 siRNAs with high activity, proved efficient in designing potent siRNAs with apure bioinformatics approach, without requiring high-throughput experimental screening.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main obstacle to siRNA usage invivo lies in the difficulty of delivery to the target organs (in the case of COVID-19: respiratory epithelia). But the administration of anebulized siRNA solution by inhalation is under development [ 30 ] and it gave promising results with chemically-modified or unmodified siRNAs directed against SARS-CoV-2 [ 58 , 61 ]. Optimal timing for siRNA administration would also need to be optimized ( e.g ., administering the siRNAs at various time points before or after viral exposure, then scoring clinical outcomes), because the amplitude of viral replication and its anatonomical localization vary greatly in the course of COVID-19 infection [ 67 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%