2020
DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FROGG patterns of practice survey and consensus recommendations on radiation therapy for MIBC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(122 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 The use of hypoxia-modifying agents such as CON concurrently with RT in the management of MIBC is acceptable in the recently published FROGG clinical practice guidelines. 18 The standard RT dose recommended for BPTT was either 55 Gy in 20 fractions or 64 Gy in 32 fractions with concurrent chemotherapy. 18 Alternatively, hypofractionated RT alone using 55 Gy in 20 fractions with or without concurrent CON is offered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…24 The use of hypoxia-modifying agents such as CON concurrently with RT in the management of MIBC is acceptable in the recently published FROGG clinical practice guidelines. 18 The standard RT dose recommended for BPTT was either 55 Gy in 20 fractions or 64 Gy in 32 fractions with concurrent chemotherapy. 18 Alternatively, hypofractionated RT alone using 55 Gy in 20 fractions with or without concurrent CON is offered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 The standard RT dose recommended for BPTT was either 55 Gy in 20 fractions or 64 Gy in 32 fractions with concurrent chemotherapy. 18 Alternatively, hypofractionated RT alone using 55 Gy in 20 fractions with or without concurrent CON is offered. 18 To reflect standard practice in Australia for the treatment of bladder cancer encompassing a traditional 2-Gy per day fractionation and a hypofractionated moderately accelerated schedule, our study considers both fractionation schedules, especially in a group of patients who are not suitable for chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite all UK radiotherapy centres being volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) enabled, and having conebeam computed tomography (CBCT) capabilities, the available state of the art radiotherapy techniques are not uniformly utilised, with only 45% of patients treated with a VMAT (30%) or IMRT (15%) technique [56] and 79% having CBCT for treatment verification. This is in contrast to practice in Australia and New Zealand, with 85% of radiation oncologists using VMAT or IMRT and 82% employing a daily soft-tissue match using CBCT [70]. Currently, national radiotherapy consensus statements for radiotherapy for MIBC do not exist in the UK, as they do in other countries [70] and have been shown to enhance treatment delivery and technique in other tumour sites [71].…”
Section: Evolution Of Radiotherapy Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to practice in Australia and New Zealand, with 85% of radiation oncologists using VMAT or IMRT and 82% employing a daily soft-tissue match using CBCT [70]. Currently, national radiotherapy consensus statements for radiotherapy for MIBC do not exist in the UK, as they do in other countries [70] and have been shown to enhance treatment delivery and technique in other tumour sites [71].…”
Section: Evolution Of Radiotherapy Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%