2013
DOI: 10.1090/s1088-4165-2013-00430-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frobenius–Schur indicators of unipotent characters and the twisted involution module

Abstract: Abstract. Let W be a finite Weyl group and σ a non-trivial graph automorphism of W . We show a remarkable relation between the σ-twisted involution module for W and the Frobenius-Schur indicators of the unipotent characters of a corresponding twisted finite group of Lie type. This extends earlier results of Lusztig and Vogan for the untwisted case and then allows us to state a general result valid for any finite group of Lie type. Inspired by recent work of Marberg, we also formally define Frobenius-Schur indi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also mention that when W is finite, the irreducible decomposition of M q 2 has a surprising interpretation in terms of the "Fourier transform" of a set of "unipotent characters" attached to (W, S). This phenomenon, which is studied in various cases in the articles [3,7,15,20,23], gives one more indication that M q 2 deserves consideration not only in the crystallographic case.…”
Section: "Twisted Kazhdan-lusztig Theory"mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We also mention that when W is finite, the irreducible decomposition of M q 2 has a surprising interpretation in terms of the "Fourier transform" of a set of "unipotent characters" attached to (W, S). This phenomenon, which is studied in various cases in the articles [3,7,15,20,23], gives one more indication that M q 2 deserves consideration not only in the crystallographic case.…”
Section: "Twisted Kazhdan-lusztig Theory"mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The fact that ρ C indeed is equal to the character originally constructed in [Ko] is shown in [GeMa,Rem. 2.2].…”
Section: Conjecture 57 (Kottwitz [Ko §1]) Let C Be a Union Of Conjmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Let Φ be the parabolic subsystem defined by W . Then, for any w ∈ C W (σ), we have ε σ (w) = (−1) k , where k is the number of positive roots in Φ which are sent to negative roots by w (see also [GeMa,Rem. 2.2]).…”
Section: Definition 64 ([mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(More precisely, Kottwitz computed the irreducible constituents of certain representations induced from the centralizers of involutions in W . The sum of these induced representations is isomorphic to ̺ W , although this is not an obvious fact; see [22,Remark 2.2] for a detailed explanation.) Kottwitz proved this formula in the classical cases, while Casselman [14] carried out the calculations necessary to check it in the exceptional ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%