2020
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FRN and P3 during the Iowa gambling task: The importance of gender

Abstract: Previous research has shown gender‐related psychobiological differences in risky and competitive strategies that affect win and loss outcomes. In addition, some studies have found differences in the decision‐making process, with women taking longer to reach the same performance as men. However, the underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear. The present study aimed to investigate gender differences in behavioral performance and neural correlates during a decision‐making task, the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). For… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results revealed that participants in the LF condition processed feedback more deeply. These findings are consistent with a study by Garrido‐Chaves et al (2021) who reported more sensitivity to losses compared to wins and stronger FRN during the IGT. Accordingly, we argue that the order effect in the present study can be explained by the fact that language control induces deeper evaluation processing in earlier stages of feedback.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results revealed that participants in the LF condition processed feedback more deeply. These findings are consistent with a study by Garrido‐Chaves et al (2021) who reported more sensitivity to losses compared to wins and stronger FRN during the IGT. Accordingly, we argue that the order effect in the present study can be explained by the fact that language control induces deeper evaluation processing in earlier stages of feedback.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…All participants were right-handed, measured by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory ( Oldfield, 1971 ). The young sample without SMCs was part of the study sample reported in Garrido-Chaves et al (2020) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Financial decision quality was determined as the selection of advantageous decks (i.e., Decks C and D) over the selection of disadvantageous decks (i.e., Decks A and B). A predominance of advantageous decks thus reflected good financial decision quality, whereas a predominance of disadvantageous decks indicated impaired financial decision quality ( Garrido-Chaves et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%