Fritz Schulz (1879–1957)

Schermaier, Martin; Grundmann, Stefan; Klöepfer, Michael; Paulus, Christoph G.; Schröder, Rainer; Werle, Gerhard

doi:10.1515/9783899496307.683

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Results2

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Year Published

2019

2020

Publication Types

Select...

Book4

Other2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent6

Authors

Journals

Cited by 12 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, pride of place is given to Papinianus, Quaestiones and other specific works of classical Roman jurists in Schulz 1946;Ernst 2004: 175-7. 20 For instance, Van Caenegem 2002Schermaier 2010: 696-7. 21 See, for example, Schulz 1934.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Autonomy and Authority: The Image of the Roman Jurists in Schulz and Wieacker

Giltaij¹

2019

Roman Law and the Idea of Europe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…21 See, for example, Schulz 1934. Other examples in Schermaier 2010: 696-7. 22 Schulz 1934 See, for instance, Wieacker 1939: 446-7: 'regierenden Geschlechter' , 'adelige Rechtskenner wie die Scaevola ' , etc., and, later, Wieacker 1988: 528-31;Wolf 2006: 30.…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

Autonomy and Authority: The Image of the Roman Jurists in Schulz and Wieacker

Giltaij¹

2019

Roman Law and the Idea of Europe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Empire of Law

Tuori

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

What emerged from the works of the exiles was a powerful new theory on the shared European legal past that laid the foundation for the idea of a common European legal culture. From this common foundation, ideals such as the rule of law, law as science, and law independent from political power would have spread to form a liberal European legal culture. This theory was further developed by legal scholars and historians who had at some point collaborated with the regime. The uniting factor was that these were German-speaking legal scholars with some background in Roman law and legal history. Thus, the formulators can be divided into two distinct groups, 1) exiles and outcasts, those who were driven from their posts and 2) the collaborators and bystanders, who either thrived in the new circumstances under the Nazis or managed to avoid controversies. Of the first group, I have selected three significant scholars, of which Fritz Schulz (1879-1957) 6 and Fritz Pringsheim (1882-1967) 7 were exiled 8 in Britain, while Paul Koschaker (1878-1951) 9 was sidelined and retreated to a provincial university. From the second group, I have selected two younger scholars, Franz Wieacker , 10 a pupil of Helmut Coing (1912-2000), 11 whose post-WWII careers cemented the position of the common past theory. Their works are contextualized by juxtaposition and comparison with contemporaries such as Hannah Arendt,

show abstract

Preface

2020

Empire of Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fritz Schulz (1879–1957)

Cited by 12 publications

References 0 publications

Autonomy and Authority: The Image of the Roman Jurists in Schulz and Wieacker

Autonomy and Authority: The Image of the Roman Jurists in Schulz and Wieacker

Empire of Law

Preface

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About