1997
DOI: 10.1038/ng0797-283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fringe boundaries coincide with Notch-dependent patterning centres in mammals and alter Notch-dependent development in Drosophila

Abstract: In both vertebrate and invertebrate development, cells are often programmed to adopt fates distinct from their neighbors. Genetic analyses in Drosophila melanogaster have highlighted the importance of cell surface and secreted proteins in these cell fate decisions. Homologues of these proteins have been identified and shown to play similar roles in vertebrate development. Fringe, a novel signalling protein, has been shown to induce wing margin formation in Drosophila. Fringe shares significant sequence homolog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
93
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
93
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In some tissues where the expression pattern has been documented in detail, e.g., nervous system (Cohen et al, 1997;Ishii et al, 2000), epidermis (Cohen et al, 1997;Thelu et al, 2002), teeth (Harada et al, 1999;Pouyet and Mitsiadis, 2000;Mustonen et al, 2002), and hair follicles (Favier et al, 2000;Chen and Chuong, 2000), fringe expression appears to mark a contrast between uncommitted cells, which express lunatic fringe, and their committed progeny, which express radical and/or manic fringe, but it is clear from our present data in the zebrafish that this is by no means a universal rule. Moreover, patterns of expression of fringe genes are not always conserved.…”
Section: Expression Patterns Of Fringe Genes In Different Vertebratescontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some tissues where the expression pattern has been documented in detail, e.g., nervous system (Cohen et al, 1997;Ishii et al, 2000), epidermis (Cohen et al, 1997;Thelu et al, 2002), teeth (Harada et al, 1999;Pouyet and Mitsiadis, 2000;Mustonen et al, 2002), and hair follicles (Favier et al, 2000;Chen and Chuong, 2000), fringe expression appears to mark a contrast between uncommitted cells, which express lunatic fringe, and their committed progeny, which express radical and/or manic fringe, but it is clear from our present data in the zebrafish that this is by no means a universal rule. Moreover, patterns of expression of fringe genes are not always conserved.…”
Section: Expression Patterns Of Fringe Genes In Different Vertebratescontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…1A for details, Wu et al, 1996;Johnston et al, 1997;Cohen et al, 1997;Laufer et al, 1997;Rodriguez-Esteban et al, 1997;Cadinouche et al, 1999;Mikami et al, 2001), including a putative signal peptide, potential N-linked glycosylation sites, a DXDmotif responsible for the glycosyltransferase catalytic activity (Moloney et al, 2000;Brü ckner et al, 2000) and six conserved cysteines that are thought to form disulfide bonds (Irvine and Wieschaus, 1994). Interestingly, the putative tetrabasic proteolytic sites are only found in Xenopus and chicken Rfng, suggesting that zebrafish, newt, rat, mouse, and human Rfng proteins may not require regulated proteolytic activation.…”
Section: Cloning and Sequence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple alignment provides a more stringent comparison than simple pairwise alignments, and these 84 amino acids constitute a core of structural elements that are presumably essential for normal FNG function. The high degree of sequence similarity among fng genes is consistent with the conserved enzymatic activity of Drosophila and mammalian FNG (8), and with the biological activity of mouse fng genes expressed in Drosophila (15,16).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Embryos were stained with BM Purple AP substrate (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and postfixed with 4% PFA in PBS. The following probes were used: Hand1 (eHAND) (Srivastava et al, 1995); Nodal (Zhou et al, 1993); Lefty1 (Ebaf) and Lefty2 (Leftb) (Meno et al, 1997); Pitx2 ; T (brachyury) (Herrmann, 1991); Hnf3b (Ang et al, 1993); Dll1 (Bettenhausen et al, 1995); Dll3 (Dunwoodie et al, 1997); Jag1 (Mitsiadis et al, 1997); Notch1 (Del Amo et al, 1992); Notch2 (Larsson et al, 1994); and Lfng (Cohen et al, 1997).…”
Section: Mice and Embryo Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%