Friendships among Competitors in the Sydney Hotel Industry

Abstract

Friendships with competitors can improve the performance of organizations through the mechanisms of enhanced collaboration, mitigated competition, and better information exchange. Moreover, these benefits are best achieved when competing managers are embedded in a cohesive network of friendships (i.e., one with many friendships among competitors), since cohesion facilitates the verification of information culled from the network, eliminates the structural holes faced by customers, and facilitates the normative control of competitors. The first part of this analysis examines the performance implications of the friendship-network structure within the Sydney hotel industry, with performance being the yield (i.e., revenue per available room) of a given hotel. This shows that friendships with competitors lead to dramatic improvements in hotel yields. Performance is further improved if a manager's competitors are themselves friends, evidencing the benefit of cohesive friendship networks. The second part of the analysis examines the structure of friendship ties among hotel managers and shows that friendships are more likely between managers who are competitors.

Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem

“…Would we find the same patterns for Off-Broadway and experimental theatre where there is less of a focus on creativity through convention-plus-extension than there is for Broadway? While more research is obviously needed before extensions of this research can be made to other contexts and to target levels of Q, it does provide a new avenue of research that follows in the tradition of research on the strength of weak ties and embeddedness, which have been extended from their original sites of job search and organizational behavior to social movements, gender and race studies, mergers and acquisitions, norm formation, price formation, international trade, and other socio-economic phenomena (Montgomery 1998;Rao et al 2001;Lincoln et al 1992;Sacks et al Uzzi 2001;Ingram and Roberts 2000;Uzzi and Lancaster 2004).…”

Learning from My Success and from Others' Failure: Evidence from Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

“…In addition, learning can occur not only from one's own actions (direct experience) but also from the experiences of others (indirect experience) (Levitt and March 1988;Huber 1991;Miner and Haunschild 1995). Empirical work supports this claim, finding that knowledge can be transferred, in part, across and within organizations (Argote et al 1990;Darr, Argote and Epple 1995;Ingram and Roberts 2000). However, while this body of research finds evidence for individual learning from both direct and indirect experience, until recently, it did not examine differential learning based on a successful or failed outcome.…”

Business Events and Friendship: Leveraging the Sociable Legacies

“…The friendship that arises from business relationships has been found to result in instrumental benefits for careers and improved organizational performance (Ingram & Zou, 2008); personal contacts and the sharing and exchanging of information that can lead to decisions regarding strategic activities of the firm (Deans, Gill, & Apedaile, 1996;Turnbull & Wheeler, 2009); assessment of market trends (Deans et al, 1996); and tacit collusion and cooperative efforts (Ingram & roberts, 2000). Significantly, though, harris and Wheeler (2005) explain that the origins of these relationships encouraged his colleagues to attend the National Association of Teachers of Speech Convention: "there we shall have an opportunity to meet friends and fellow-workers and enjoy social hours together" (p. 566).…”