1988
DOI: 10.1080/00224545.1988.9713747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Friendship and Freedom of Movement as Moderators of Sex Differences in Interpersonal Distancing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…But research also suggests that stigma interacts with sex (or gender) to produce specific patterns of distancing. One robust observation seems to be that female-female dyads interact at closer distances than male-female dyads, which in turn interact at closer distances than male-male dyads (Bell, Kline, & Barnard, 1988). From this set of hypotheses the prediction can be derived that H3: Passengers will interact at greater distances with the actress when she wears the Romani skirt.…”
Section: Women Less Distant Than Menmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But research also suggests that stigma interacts with sex (or gender) to produce specific patterns of distancing. One robust observation seems to be that female-female dyads interact at closer distances than male-female dyads, which in turn interact at closer distances than male-male dyads (Bell, Kline, & Barnard, 1988). From this set of hypotheses the prediction can be derived that H3: Passengers will interact at greater distances with the actress when she wears the Romani skirt.…”
Section: Women Less Distant Than Menmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, with regard to the correlation between social space and social emotion, skin-to-skin touch communicationsuch as a caressing action from a mother to her infant-is an example of the closest inter-individual space, but it also exhibits the highest intimacy in social relationships among individuals. Furthermore, getting close to another is a social strategy used to express intimacy (Mehrabian, 1969;Ashton et al, 1980;Gifford, 1982;Bell et al, 1988;Fini et al, 2013;Pezzulo et al, 2013;Teneggi et al, 2013). In non-human primates (we focused on macaque monkeys), the equivalent of this human interpersonal touch could be the social grooming (allogrooming).…”
Section: Visual Corticesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El factor "alejamiento" consta de cinco reactivos que se refieren a la interpretación que el participante hace al respecto de una conversación con su pareja, matizada de falta de atención, desapego, dominio, distancia y aburrimiento. Al parecer, y de acuerdo con Bell, Kline y Barnard (1988), cuando una conversación es amenazante o rara, se puede generar mayor distancia de la otra persona. Por su parte, Crane, Dollahite, Griffin y Taylor (1987) indican que cuando las parejas están más insatisfechas, favorecen mayor alejamiento de su pareja ya que esto los protege de amenazas, de malos tratos o desagravios.…”
Section: Escala De Comunicación No Verbal-interpretaciónunclassified