Copyright and Cultural Heritage 2010
DOI: 10.4337/9781849808033.00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Friends or Foes? Two Ways of Thinking on the Relation between the Tasks of Cultural Heritage Institutions and the Protection of Copyright

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sovereignty of national cultures is tested by the dependence of memory institutions on informational capitalism for the distribution of digitized materials (Bonde Thylstrup 2018). This prerogative raises instead new questions regarding how to balance the interests of access to cultural heritage and the rights of copyright holders (Belder 2010;Bruncevic 2018;Hemmungs Wirtén 2008). The modern definition of property and accompanying legal architecture is usually recognized to have its origin in John Locke's philosophy positing property as a natural right that precedes government (Anderson and Geismar 2017:4).…”
Section: Copyright Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sovereignty of national cultures is tested by the dependence of memory institutions on informational capitalism for the distribution of digitized materials (Bonde Thylstrup 2018). This prerogative raises instead new questions regarding how to balance the interests of access to cultural heritage and the rights of copyright holders (Belder 2010;Bruncevic 2018;Hemmungs Wirtén 2008). The modern definition of property and accompanying legal architecture is usually recognized to have its origin in John Locke's philosophy positing property as a natural right that precedes government (Anderson and Geismar 2017:4).…”
Section: Copyright Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%