2013
DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2013.835238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Friends, Family, and Caregiving Among Midlife and Older Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Adults

Abstract: The study examines the frequency and nature of the informal caregiving experience for midlife and older lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) adults. Responses from a Twin Cities Metropolitan Area LGBT aging needs assessment survey were analyzed for social supports, current caregiving activity and availability of a caregiver. The majority of respondents identified a primary caregiver who was not a legal relation; and compared to the general population were (a) less likely to have traditional sources of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
91
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
91
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We offer an exploratory investigation of key barriers, strengths and recommendations that could inform the adaptation of a NORC or Village Model to support LGBTQ older adults. While we focused on one metropolitan area, the barriers, strengths and recommendations identified are consistent with similar investigations of aging LGBTQ adults (Van Wagenen et al, 2013; Croghan et al , 2014; Orel, 2014; Brennan-Ing et al, 2014), indicating that our findings may be broadly applied to other locations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…We offer an exploratory investigation of key barriers, strengths and recommendations that could inform the adaptation of a NORC or Village Model to support LGBTQ older adults. While we focused on one metropolitan area, the barriers, strengths and recommendations identified are consistent with similar investigations of aging LGBTQ adults (Van Wagenen et al, 2013; Croghan et al , 2014; Orel, 2014; Brennan-Ing et al, 2014), indicating that our findings may be broadly applied to other locations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Embedded within social networks of families of choice, kin, friends, and legally defined family members, the most common social relationships studied were with spouses and partners [47, 49, 59, 63, 80, 81], friends and peer relationships [37, 41, 50, 71, 82], followed by children [46], informal caregivers [50, 80], other household members [20], and pets [66]. Broader social networks and supports were also investigated [32, 33, 46].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social networks were also larger among women [46, 63], younger individuals [46, 59], trans individuals, and those living with children [46]. Having a partner and co-residing with that partner were associated with being White [49], younger [47, 59], and female [80]. Loneliness and social isolation, on the other hand, were associated with being male, being single, being less socially embedded, and having a smaller social network [32, 33].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…which provide the framework for mutual care, responsibility and commitment for many lesbians and gay men." Almack, Seymour, and Bellamy (2010) and Croghan, Moone, and Olson (2014), among others, have also written about the importance of these "families of choice" or "chosen families" to older lesbians and gay men. 1 Heaphy, Yip, and Thompson (2004:890) stress the importance of recognising this kind of kinship in later life as "highly relevant to the understanding of the relational contexts in which non-heterosexuals age."…”
Section: Families Of Choicementioning
confidence: 99%