Goethe Handbuch 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-476-00206-8_41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Friedrich, Caspar David (1774–1840)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the German painter distinguishes himself by his elaboration and reconstruction of pictorial space aimed at defining a scene in which inconsistencies in the volumetric setting creates disorientation in the observer. (Grave, 2012) An example, that defines these peculiarities as Degrees of Freedom that influenced Friedrich's work, is the scaling and sizing of the instances of representation considering the perspectival structure created by the painter. This representational inconsistency, for instance in the painting The Sea of Ice, is precisely described by Johannes Grave in his monography on Friedrich.…”
Section: Degrees Of Freedom and Caspar David Friedrichmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, the German painter distinguishes himself by his elaboration and reconstruction of pictorial space aimed at defining a scene in which inconsistencies in the volumetric setting creates disorientation in the observer. (Grave, 2012) An example, that defines these peculiarities as Degrees of Freedom that influenced Friedrich's work, is the scaling and sizing of the instances of representation considering the perspectival structure created by the painter. This representational inconsistency, for instance in the painting The Sea of Ice, is precisely described by Johannes Grave in his monography on Friedrich.…”
Section: Degrees Of Freedom and Caspar David Friedrichmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This representational inconsistency, for instance in the painting The Sea of Ice, is precisely described by Johannes Grave in his monography on Friedrich. Grave mentions the relationship between the size of the objects in the representation and the perspective definition of the depiction as the painter's denial of the aesthetic concept of the sublime in his work (Grave, 2012). Indeed, the presence of elements that disorient the observer, forcing them to a loss of spatial awareness, leads to a break between the painted scene and its observer, a materialized caesura on the pictorial surface.…”
Section: Degrees Of Freedom and Caspar David Friedrichmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a Lutheran, Friedrich shared a general scepticism towards the sense of sight, which inspired him to create a new form of religious art. As Johannes Grave has pointed out, Friedrich's landscape paintings show the artist's way of thinking about the medial conditionalities of images among negotiations of theological questions (Grave, 2011). This is not to say that Caspar David Friedrich had no interest in the atmospheric changes brought about by the onset of industrialization or that Romantic art in general is not crucial for scientific knowledge production, quite the contrary.…”
Section: Historic Paintings As Documents? Caspar Davidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oder noch anders ausgedrückt: Die möglichst eindeutige (symbolische) Ausdeutung der wie Embleme herausgelesenen Inhalte im Bild dominiert die Interpretation so stark, dass nicht mehr darauf geachtet wird, dass aufgrund eines absichtlich durch Friedrich verunklärten perspektivischen Betrachterstandortes eine eindeutige Sinnfestschreibung erst außerhalb des Bildes durch den Betrachter erfolgen kann. 53 Die entscheidende Rolle des betrachtenden Subjekts wird auch in einer anderen Quelle formuliert, die Hilmar Frank erstmals auf Caspar David Friedrich bezogen hat. 51 Indes scheint das perspektivische, auf einen subjektiven Betrachter bezogene Sehen weit früher in das 18.…”
unclassified