2004
DOI: 10.1039/b310991g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frictional force microscopic detection of frictional asymmetry and anisotropy at (101̄4) surface of calcite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 In addition, the friction characteristics also showed the same results for the surface of CaCO 3 (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). 16 In conclusion, it can be said that friction is caused by the potential interaction of the probe and surface element, and that it increases with increasing surface roughness [ Fig. 6(b)].…”
Section: Frictional Property By Rubbing Conditionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…15 In addition, the friction characteristics also showed the same results for the surface of CaCO 3 (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). 16 In conclusion, it can be said that friction is caused by the potential interaction of the probe and surface element, and that it increases with increasing surface roughness [ Fig. 6(b)].…”
Section: Frictional Property By Rubbing Conditionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Frictional asymmetry was clearly detected with FFM with the normal load of 125 nN and with the scan length of 100 μm 16) . Similar asymmetry was observed in friction measurements in millimeter-scale using a Bowden-Leben apparatus with a sapphire stylus of 60° cone angle, applying the normal load smaller than 49 mN 20) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In nano-scale friction, however, clear asymmetry has been observed at single crystal surfaces having tilted S = O bonds of sulfate ions [12][13][14][15] , C = O bonds of carbonate ions 16) , or long-chain organic molecules adsorbed [17][18][19] . The asymmetry was explained using mechanical models of mass-spring systems 15,16) . With (1 0 -1 4) surface of calcite crystal (CaCO 3 , Mohs hardness = 3), comparison between frictions in nano-scale and larger scale was possible, since nearly atom-flat surfaces with wide areas are obtained in cleavage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been included in many research activities [16][17][18][19][20][21], exerted significant influence on all kinds of scientific and technical fields. Ever since invented in 1986 [22], the atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been viewed as a powerful tool to study the mechanical properties of different materials at multiscales [23][24][25], because it can provide local information of scanned surfaces, such as hardness, roughness and chemical states. For friction research, the AFM make it possible to address single asperity at the atomic scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%