2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2020.104106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frictional behavior of sandstone fractures under forward-backward pre-peak cyclic loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed that the shear sliding mechanism was significant at low normal stress and that the second-order asperities were not effective during shear cycles. However, in another report for pre-peak cyclic shear loading (Thongprapha et al, 2020 [ 27 ]) with higher normal stress, the second-order asperities were diminished; subsequently, joint roughness and shear resistance were decreased. Belem et al, 2007 [ 28 ] and Belem et al, 2009 [ 29 ] investigated joint surface degradation under CNL and CNS for monotonic and cyclic shearing by laser scanning and proposed a method for the estimation of joint surface wearing based on changing normal loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was observed that the shear sliding mechanism was significant at low normal stress and that the second-order asperities were not effective during shear cycles. However, in another report for pre-peak cyclic shear loading (Thongprapha et al, 2020 [ 27 ]) with higher normal stress, the second-order asperities were diminished; subsequently, joint roughness and shear resistance were decreased. Belem et al, 2007 [ 28 ] and Belem et al, 2009 [ 29 ] investigated joint surface degradation under CNL and CNS for monotonic and cyclic shearing by laser scanning and proposed a method for the estimation of joint surface wearing based on changing normal loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding rock fatigue damage, significant attention has been paid to maximum stress [5], stress amplitudes [6][7], dynamic frequency [8], loading waveforms [9][10], and strain rates [11]. Several fatigue models were proposed according to ultrasonic velocity [12], rock deformation [13][14], elastic modulus [15], energy dissipation [16][17], acoustic emission characteristics [18], and the load-unload response ratio (LURR) [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it comes to the influence of loading rate on mechanical responses of rock, scholars have carried out a lot of research work on strength, deformation and failure characteristics, and achieved fruitful research results (Hashiba and Fukui, 2015;Meng et al, 2016;Imani et al, 2017;Feng et al, 2018;Kang et al, 2019;Thongprapha et al, 2020;Tang et al, 2021;Lu et al, 2022;Tie et al, 2023). It has been proven that loading rate, as an important factor, can significantly affect the mechanical characteristics of rock.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%