“…As can be seen, it differs from those used by De Chiffre, in patent US 7,617,750 (2009), patent application US 2014/0017113 (2014), and papers [63,66] in one, but essential, aspect, namely face cutting instead of disk cutting (as shown in Fig. In the setup used by Den et al [71], there is no cutting speed variation as this speed is defined by the rotational speed of the workpiece, n (rpm) and workpiece diameter which does not change. In the latter case, the cutting speed decreases as tool progresses if the workpiece rotates at the same rotational speed as the diameter of the workpiece decreases.…”