2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Friction reduction measurement for a coiled tubing working in a marine riser

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Falser et al 15 also proceeded experimental and numerical analysis on how the tilt angle would influence CT's axial force transfer behavior and the radial clearance would influence riser's axial pressure, the results showed that tilt angle would affect CT's axial force transfer behavior very few, and radial clearance has nothing to do with riser's axial pressure. By proceeding experimental study on straight pipe-in-pipe system, Chen et al 16,17 found that when injecting force is less than inner pipe's critical helical buckling load, inner pipe's axial load transfer efficiency is basically the same under ''unfixed boundary'' and ''fixed boundary.'' When injecting force is bigger than inner pipe's critical helical buckling load, ''unfixed boundary'' would help decrease inner pipe's axial load transfer efficiency; inner pipe with bigger diameter can help increase its axial load transfer efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Falser et al 15 also proceeded experimental and numerical analysis on how the tilt angle would influence CT's axial force transfer behavior and the radial clearance would influence riser's axial pressure, the results showed that tilt angle would affect CT's axial force transfer behavior very few, and radial clearance has nothing to do with riser's axial pressure. By proceeding experimental study on straight pipe-in-pipe system, Chen et al 16,17 found that when injecting force is less than inner pipe's critical helical buckling load, inner pipe's axial load transfer efficiency is basically the same under ''unfixed boundary'' and ''fixed boundary.'' When injecting force is bigger than inner pipe's critical helical buckling load, ''unfixed boundary'' would help decrease inner pipe's axial load transfer efficiency; inner pipe with bigger diameter can help increase its axial load transfer efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of gravity, torsion, and axial compression on buckling for an oil drill pipe constrained in a horizontal cylinder were experimentally studied by Wicks et al [ 16 ]. Yinchun Chen et al [ 17 ] investigated the axial force transfer when the coiled tubing constrained in a horizontal wellbore. The experimental results indicated that coiled tubing’s axial force transfer efficiency is reduced with the growth of annular clearance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%