2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2012.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Friction and wear properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)–hydroxyapatite hybrid coating on UHMWPE substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, exact mechanisms regarding UHMWPE adhesion is still under study 27 , whereas tribological contact represents yet additional influential factor. In another study, thin layer of PMMA deposited on the UHMWPE produced COF values of 0.12–0.16 (for 6–10 N load range) and 0.18–0.22 (for lower load range of 2–4 N) 28 , what is in consistence with our results (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, exact mechanisms regarding UHMWPE adhesion is still under study 27 , whereas tribological contact represents yet additional influential factor. In another study, thin layer of PMMA deposited on the UHMWPE produced COF values of 0.12–0.16 (for 6–10 N load range) and 0.18–0.22 (for lower load range of 2–4 N) 28 , what is in consistence with our results (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, tribological contact in chemically aggressive environment can affect its chemical reactions, due to the changes in UHMWPE wettability and mechanical interlocking in surface layers. Hence, under some conditions, UHMWPE can react with PMMA 2729 , meaning that it can form thin PMMA layers within nano and micro surface regions during the tribological contact that might be responsible for the further changes in frictional response during one test. Physico-chemical mechanisms (intermolecular interactions, chemical bonding, physical adhesion) or mechanical interlocking during the micro and nano contacts, due to the surface roughness shapes (crevices, pits, valleys and similar) both promote adhesion on the UHMWPE surface, especially at micro scale 27 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percent decrease in the wear rate of the composites concerning its matrix varies from system to system depending upon the particle morphology of the fillers and other experimental conditions. A 5.5% and 35.2% decrease in the wear rate was observed at 2 and 8 N, respectively, for C m C for the PMMA matrix in a dry condition [ 54 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations pointed to the fact that the addition of filler particles improved the wear-resistance property of the polymer matrix [ 54 ]. Furthermore, the particle uniformity and particle morphology of the added particles strongly affected the optimum concentration of the particles in the composite as high concentration (0.8 Wt%) of the commercial irregular and nonuniform particles (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the wear debris of DLC coated UHMWPE is only carbon debris after depositing which may decrease the osteolysis [146]. Poly (methyl methacrylate)-hydroxyapatite hybrid coating on UHMWPE has stronger adhesive force with substrate, lower friction coefficient and wear rate than poly (methyl methacrylate) coating [147]. Both polymethylmethacrylate and hydroxyapatite have good biocompatibility and hydroxyapatite has better osteoinduction ability, therefore, this hybrid coating has potential to be employed in biomedicine.…”
Section: Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylene (Uhmwpe) Biomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%