2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FRF based joint dynamics modeling and identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to fully illustrate the information on the measured data, the prior distribution is assumed to be a uniform distribution. Using equation (13) with D = 0:15, the 'measured' displacement PSD of the 'measured point' with 15% noise level is generated at first. Figure 3 presents 'measured' displacement PSD in the frequency range of 0-60 Hz where 1200 frequency points are regularly distributed.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to fully illustrate the information on the measured data, the prior distribution is assumed to be a uniform distribution. Using equation (13) with D = 0:15, the 'measured' displacement PSD of the 'measured point' with 15% noise level is generated at first. Figure 3 presents 'measured' displacement PSD in the frequency range of 0-60 Hz where 1200 frequency points are regularly distributed.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(8) in Eq. (14) and also accounting for the compatibility conditions of Eq. (16), the union between the subsystems A and AB 2 can be written in compact matrix form as: …”
Section: Substructure Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, sometimes the reverse problem of decoupling becomes necessary. Examples of decoupling include extraction of rotational FRFs at coupling points using the inverse RCSA techniques [9,14]. 3 Decoupling to extract dynamics of the complete machine that are to be subsequently coupled to other substructures, as is considered in this paper, is new.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The substructures are connected to each other by joints, which may result in the discontinuity of the mechanical structure in practice. The complex joint behaviors influence the properties of the whole machine significantly (Mehrpouya et al, 2013;Gao et al, 2015). Actually the dynamic stiffness of the assembled structure is highly dependent on the joint stiffness, which takes up 60-80% of the entire dynamic stiffness (Burdekin et al, 1979) and causes 40-60% deformations (Vafaei et al, 2002) generally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%