The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought 2003
DOI: 10.1017/chol9780521563543.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Freud and his followers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Horney explained that there are two drives that are the most important in the development of neuroses; they are the need for affection and the desire for control or power (Horney, 1937 Horney contributed many new ideas and theories to psychoanalysis. These included: 1) Founded feminine or feminist psychology (Horney, 1967) 2) Developed the theory of neurotic needs, describing methods people employ in coping with neurosis (Horney, 1937) 3) Founded the American Journal of Psychoanalysis (Roazen, 1992) 4) Founded the Neo-Freudian School along with Adler and others (Quinn, 1987) 5) Researched and described the nature of narcissism (Horney, 1950) 6) Described womb envy in men as a counter to Freud's penis envy (Horney, 1967) 7) Developed a more holistic, humanistic view than Freud of the human psyche (Horney, 1950) 8) Presented the first published papers on feminine psychiatry (Horney, 1967) 9) Developed one of the first self-help books entitled Are You Considering Psychoanalysis? (Horney, 1946) (Etkind, 1997, p. 132).…”
Section: Lou Von Salome (1861 To 1937)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Horney explained that there are two drives that are the most important in the development of neuroses; they are the need for affection and the desire for control or power (Horney, 1937 Horney contributed many new ideas and theories to psychoanalysis. These included: 1) Founded feminine or feminist psychology (Horney, 1967) 2) Developed the theory of neurotic needs, describing methods people employ in coping with neurosis (Horney, 1937) 3) Founded the American Journal of Psychoanalysis (Roazen, 1992) 4) Founded the Neo-Freudian School along with Adler and others (Quinn, 1987) 5) Researched and described the nature of narcissism (Horney, 1950) 6) Described womb envy in men as a counter to Freud's penis envy (Horney, 1967) 7) Developed a more holistic, humanistic view than Freud of the human psyche (Horney, 1950) 8) Presented the first published papers on feminine psychiatry (Horney, 1967) 9) Developed one of the first self-help books entitled Are You Considering Psychoanalysis? (Horney, 1946) (Etkind, 1997, p. 132).…”
Section: Lou Von Salome (1861 To 1937)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do know that she began her career as a disciple of Freud. According to Roazen (1992), Karen was the analysand of Hanss Sachs. She was also analyzed by Karl Abraham (Paris, 1994).…”
Section: Anna Freud (1895 To 1982)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A close examination of the photograph [1] reveals that Freud, who was 5'7" tall, is the center of the picture paradoxically towering over Jung on his left whose height was 6'2" [3]. It is clear that Jung is bending over while Freud, most likely, is standing on a stool or box.…”
Section: The Photographmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in his response to Jung's request for his picture in 1907 he wrote, "In the last fifteen years I have never willingly sat for a photographer, because I am too vain to countenance my physical deterioration." In addition, Roazen [3] learned in an unpublished interview with Reik that Freud was particularly uncomfortable about his height relative to Jung's. Therefore, it seems to me that Freud was somewhat uneasy during the photograph arrangement but, my guess is that he approved and was generally pleased at his artificially elevated placement in the center of the group, and was probably appreciative of Jung's efforts.…”
Section: The Photographmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In presenting these three justifications (others could no doubt be added) for (re-)examining the part played by Reik within and outside the psychoanalytic movement, I have generally echoed opinions formulated by historians of psychoanalysis such as Roazen (1975Roazen ( /1992, Bergmann andHartman (1976/1990), Ahren and Melchers (1985) and Hale (1995), including some details found in a small handful of biographical sketches, such as those by Gustin (1953), Natterson (1966), Freeman (1971, Alby (1985), Mühlleitner (1992) and Reppen (2002aReppen ( , 2002b, and drawing on the sparkling insights of the utterly devoted Reik-scholar that is Murray H. Sherman (1965Sherman ( , 1970Sherman ( -71, 1974Sherman ( , 1981. I still believe that the aforementioned reasons may legitimize any research project on Reik, yet I am also more convinced that together they will not constitute a sufficiently solid ground for ensuring his intellectual survival outside the psychoanalytic community, and perhaps not even within its professional confines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%