2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00360-010-0447-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Freshwater elasmobranchs: a review of their physiology and biochemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
51
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
2
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given these euryhaline characteristics and the data presented herein, it seems that the life cycle of Glyphis sharks includes periods of marine dispersal in conjunction with some dependence on rivers and estuaries. In contrast to teleost fishes, 40% of which live in freshwater, only very few (about 5%) of elasmobranch species are able to survive in freshwater (28). Most of these belong to the potamotrygonid stingray family, which is fully adapted to freshwater and no longer capable of surviving in saltwater, as well as a few additional species of rays, some of which are capable of surviving in both freshwater and saltwater (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given these euryhaline characteristics and the data presented herein, it seems that the life cycle of Glyphis sharks includes periods of marine dispersal in conjunction with some dependence on rivers and estuaries. In contrast to teleost fishes, 40% of which live in freshwater, only very few (about 5%) of elasmobranch species are able to survive in freshwater (28). Most of these belong to the potamotrygonid stingray family, which is fully adapted to freshwater and no longer capable of surviving in saltwater, as well as a few additional species of rays, some of which are capable of surviving in both freshwater and saltwater (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is believed to be related to the rectal gland activity plasticity (Pillans et al, 2005), urea and trimethylamine oxide (TMAO) reabsorption by the kidney (Pillans et al, 2008), and ion uptake by the gills (Ballantyne & Robinson, 2010), which is enhanced when in freshwater. With all this put together, according to these authors, C. leucas can maintain its body hyperosmotic in freshwater environments, but loses much more water and ions due to large amounts of urine produced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ballantyne and Robinson, 2010;Ballantyne and Fraser, 2013;Pillans and Franklin, 2004;Thorson, 1962); current hypotheses suggest that metabolic organisation of elasmobranchs is responsible for their poor penetration into fresh water, resulting in metabolic costs associated with osmoregulation (Ballantyne and Robinson, 2010;Meloni et al, 2002). Whereas the difference in solute concentrations has a significant impact on the physiological biochemistry of elasmobranchs, the potential impact of the changing density of sea water and fresh water has not been adequately considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The close relationship between the locomotor performance and body density may represent a fundamental influence on the lifestyle of elasmobranchs (Bone and Roberts, 1969;Gleiss et al, 2011a) and a key aspect to understanding how the constraints of water density and buoyancy shape the lives of those species that occur in fresh water. However, this has received no attention in the literature thus far (Ballantyne and Robinson, 2010). In this paper, we aim to clarify the impact of changing water density on the buoyancy and energetics of elasmobranchs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%