2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0308-8146(00)00196-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Freshness assessment of cultured sea bream (Sparus aurata) by chemical, physical and sensory methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

27
124
6
9

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
27
124
6
9
Order By: Relevance
“…K value reached 68% on day 13 when the sensory panel rejected the fillet sample ( Figure 4B). Wide variations of K value on the sensory rejection point among different fish species were reported ranging from 39 ~ 80% in chilled storage (Alasalvar et al, 2001;Ozogul et al, 2004). In the present study, K value provided a useful indicator for freshness evaluation, which was consistent with other fish species such as Sea bass and European eel stored in ice (Alasalvar et al, 2002;Ozogul et al, 2006).…”
Section: Changes Of Nucleotide Degradation Productssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…K value reached 68% on day 13 when the sensory panel rejected the fillet sample ( Figure 4B). Wide variations of K value on the sensory rejection point among different fish species were reported ranging from 39 ~ 80% in chilled storage (Alasalvar et al, 2001;Ozogul et al, 2004). In the present study, K value provided a useful indicator for freshness evaluation, which was consistent with other fish species such as Sea bass and European eel stored in ice (Alasalvar et al, 2002;Ozogul et al, 2006).…”
Section: Changes Of Nucleotide Degradation Productssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Fax: +86-10-62731265. deterioration as amines formation, lipid oxidation, nucleotide and protein degradation, contributes to off-odors, off-flavors and texture softening (Ozogul et al, 2006;Alasalvar et al, 2001;Hernandez et al, 2009). Varieties of quality attributes have been used to assess fish freshness in many cold water fish species as sea bream, sea bass, sardine and European eel (Alasalvar et al, 2001;Alasalvar et al, 2002;Ozogul et al, 2004;Ozogul et al, 2006;Hernandez et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rapid decline was observed in T4, on day 6. These are higher values than those obtained by Alasalvar et al (2001) in bream fillets, with values between 7.5 and 5 N during 17 days of storage. On the other hand, Valencia-Perez et al (2015) observed a similar diminution of texture in blue shrimp treated with antioxidants and packed in a bilayer film of polyamide-low density polyethylene film with 2% α-tocopherol during frozen storage.…”
Section: Texturecontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Sensory methods are the most satisfactory ways of assessing the freshness quality of fish in terms of consumer expectation. However, Alasalvar et al, (2001) suggested that sensory evaluation of fish muscle should be carried out concurrently with other methods used to evaluate fish freshness. Change in microbial population is a traditional quality index of fresh fish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%