2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11084-006-9040-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fresh New Air in Space? ‘MoMa’ on the A.S.I. Launch Pad

Abstract: The present project has been developed because of the desire to unify the research lines in the A.S.I. 'Medicine & Biotechnology' area into one research line that could satisfy the interests of all of the collaborative groups and at the same time could pursue a relevant social goal. A 6 month feasibility study (SF) called MoMa was carried out in the ASI framework. During the SF the know-how and the tools already available in the national scientific community have been assessed, selected and evaluated even with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Doses utilized (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2 and 5 Gy) were selected on the basis of X-ray ranges used on different cell types (Suyama et al 1981;Antoccia et al 2002;Lanza et al 2005;Al-Jahdari et al 2008). The route of exposure (indirect radiation bursts given to cultures, as opposed to radionuclides containing sea water) and doses used were also motivated by the possibility to use the sea urchin embryo as a model organism in comparative risk assessment studies performed in the frame of National Space Agency program (Ambesi Impiombato et al 2006). The presence of morphological abnormalities was monitored by microscopic inspection 24 and 48 h after irradiation (27 and 51 h after fertilization, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doses utilized (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2 and 5 Gy) were selected on the basis of X-ray ranges used on different cell types (Suyama et al 1981;Antoccia et al 2002;Lanza et al 2005;Al-Jahdari et al 2008). The route of exposure (indirect radiation bursts given to cultures, as opposed to radionuclides containing sea water) and doses used were also motivated by the possibility to use the sea urchin embryo as a model organism in comparative risk assessment studies performed in the frame of National Space Agency program (Ambesi Impiombato et al 2006). The presence of morphological abnormalities was monitored by microscopic inspection 24 and 48 h after irradiation (27 and 51 h after fertilization, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%