2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fresh embryo transfer after in vitro insemination of fresh vs. cryopreserved anonymous donor oocytes: which has a better live birth rate? A Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although data from some donor MAR centers show comparable ART outcomes with fresh and cryopreserved donated oocytes [ 2 ], it is interesting that large data registries increasingly report significant differences in live birth rates between these two groups of donors [ 7 ]. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) guidelines also warn to be cautious about equating the development potential of fresh and cryopreserved oocytes and conclude that there is insufficient evidence that the live birth rate is the same with vitrified vs. fresh donor oocytes [ 8 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although data from some donor MAR centers show comparable ART outcomes with fresh and cryopreserved donated oocytes [ 2 ], it is interesting that large data registries increasingly report significant differences in live birth rates between these two groups of donors [ 7 ]. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) guidelines also warn to be cautious about equating the development potential of fresh and cryopreserved oocytes and conclude that there is insufficient evidence that the live birth rate is the same with vitrified vs. fresh donor oocytes [ 8 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%