2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3499824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequentist and Bayesian Change-Point Models: A Missing Link

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other criteria, such as, e.g., the Minimum Description Length (MDL) [51], were used by some authors in the specific climate context [19,31]. According to Ardia et al [52], the MDL criterion can be seen as a Bayesian criterion with an appropriate prior distribution for change point models. The obtained MDL-based penalties have thus essentially the same properties as the mBIC and were not considered in our framework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other criteria, such as, e.g., the Minimum Description Length (MDL) [51], were used by some authors in the specific climate context [19,31]. According to Ardia et al [52], the MDL criterion can be seen as a Bayesian criterion with an appropriate prior distribution for change point models. The obtained MDL-based penalties have thus essentially the same properties as the mBIC and were not considered in our framework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the specific climate context, some authors as Li and Lund (2012) and Lu et al (2010) use a MDL based-criterion (Rissanen (1978)). Ardia et al (2019) show that the MDL criterion can be seen as a Bayesian criterion with appropriate prior distributions for change-point models. As a consequence, the obtained based-MDL penalties (see Li and Lund (2012); Lu et al (2010)) looks like the mBIC (their both penalties integrate a term depending on the segment lengths of the segmentation).…”
Section: Model and Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%