2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10336-010-0642-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequentist analysis of hierarchical models for population dynamics and demographic data

Abstract: Hierarchical models include random effects or latent state variables. This class of models includes statespace models for population dynamics, which incorporate process and sampling variation, and models with random individual or year effects in capture-mark-recapture models, for example. This paper reviews methods for frequentist analysis of hierarchical models and gives an example of a non-Gaussian, potentially nonlinear analysis of Lapwing data using the Monte Carlo kernel likelihood (MCKL) method for maxim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[43], [44]). Although random-effects models can be analyzed using frequentist or Bayesian methods [45], [46], the frequentist point of view may have a number of advantages [44].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43], [44]). Although random-effects models can be analyzed using frequentist or Bayesian methods [45], [46], the frequentist point of view may have a number of advantages [44].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being very flexible, these computational methods require sufficient training to be applied correctly. As an alternative to the Bayesian approach, several approaches are being developed (Lele et al ., ; Lele & Dennis, ; De Valpine, , ) that deserve further exploration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models make a distinction between observed data and true system states by incorporating multiple sources of variation, in particular, environmental stochasticity (process noise) and sampling variation (observation error) (de Valpine andHastings 2002, Calder et al 2003). The main challenge of estimating state-space models has been the development of algorithms that appropriately explore the space of possible true system states from which the data could have been sampled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%