2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequent hepatocyte growth factor overexpression and low frequency of c-Met gene amplification in human papillomavirus–negative tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma and their prognostic significances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
52
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After title and abstract checking, 36 studies remained for the further evaluating in details, in which 15 articles were excluded for there were no enough data to calculate the survival rate [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], one article was removed because of duplication [28]. So, a total of 20 publications were fulfilled the eligibility criteria [5][6][7][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. Among them, one study was excluded by the poor data quality [45], so 19 publications were included in the final analysis.…”
Section: Literature Searching and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After title and abstract checking, 36 studies remained for the further evaluating in details, in which 15 articles were excluded for there were no enough data to calculate the survival rate [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], one article was removed because of duplication [28]. So, a total of 20 publications were fulfilled the eligibility criteria [5][6][7][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. Among them, one study was excluded by the poor data quality [45], so 19 publications were included in the final analysis.…”
Section: Literature Searching and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of the procedures of literature screening were shown in Figure 1. Among the 19 studies, 5 studies reported head and neck cancer without site information [7,33,36,39,43], 4 studies focused on oral and oropharyngeal cancer [30,32,40,44], 3 for tongue cancer [6,29,34], 3 for nasopharyngeal cancer [5,35,42], 2 for salivary gland cancer [37,38], 1 for hypopharyngeal cancer [41] and another one for tonsillar cancer [31]. The total number of patients included in the meta-analysis was 2,417, the mean sample size was 127 (ranges from 33 to 396).…”
Section: Literature Searching and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 and Table S4). Controversial findings exist regarding the prognostic significance of c-Met in HNSCC (11, 35, 36). These discrepancies are likely due to differences in the tumor sites investigated, analytical methods used (whether HPV status is stratified, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13] To ascertain whether aberrant c-Met expression accompanies human salivary ACC, we used immunohistochemical analysis to examine c-Met protein expression in 200 samples and concluded that 52% of tumors are strongly positive. Overexpression of Our study describes the largest screening of ACC samples for c-MET expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%