2022
DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2022.27.28.2200503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequent detection of monkeypox virus DNA in saliva, semen, and other clinical samples from 12 patients, Barcelona, Spain, May to June 2022

Abstract: A monkeypox (MPX) outbreak has expanded worldwide since May 2022. We tested 147 clinical samples collected at different time points from 12 patients by real-time PCR. MPX DNA was detected in saliva from all cases, sometimes with high viral loads. Other samples were frequently positive: rectal swab (11/12 cases), nasopharyngeal swab (10/12 cases), semen (7/9 cases), urine (9/12 cases) and faeces (8/12 cases). These results improve knowledge on virus shedding and the possible role of bodily fluids in disease tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

15
302
0
10

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(327 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(16 reference statements)
15
302
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…One challenge in understanding the performance of saliva-based tests is the heterogeneity with which such tests have been used in published case series (5). Our systematic rapid review, however, demonstrated 100% agreement with lesion PCR testing (5, 10, 16-19). That performance may not reflect the true performance of saliva-based tests, however, given the small overall sample size and that all included studies were case series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One challenge in understanding the performance of saliva-based tests is the heterogeneity with which such tests have been used in published case series (5). Our systematic rapid review, however, demonstrated 100% agreement with lesion PCR testing (5, 10, 16-19). That performance may not reflect the true performance of saliva-based tests, however, given the small overall sample size and that all included studies were case series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Prior studies, however, suggest that viral DNA may be detected in saliva and oropharyngeal specimens (2, 9, 10). One recent report noted 100% (n=12) patients with Human Monkeypox had positive saliva PCR tests (9). Similar findings were reported among a study of 7 individuals diagnosed with Human Monkeypox in 2018 and 2019 (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rapidly leveraging wastewater surveillance infrastructure may enhance surveillance for an emerging infectious disease such as monkeypox in real-time with minimal changes in sample collection procedures, however it is unclear how effectively these systems can be used for new outbreaks where viral shedding profiles are still being delineated. Observational studies of patients infected during the current monkeypox outbreak (summer 2022) confirms shedding of viral DNA from saliva, feces, urine, semen, and skin lesions 10,11 . Authors did not report concentrations or mass of viral DNA in their specimens, however reported Cq values from qPCR measurements were low, suggesting high concentrations of MPXV DNA even on day 16 after symptom onset 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Observational studies of patients infected during the current monkeypox outbreak (summer 2022) confirms shedding of viral DNA from saliva, feces, urine, semen, and skin lesions 10,11 . Authors did not report concentrations or mass of viral DNA in their specimens, however reported Cq values from qPCR measurements were low, suggesting high concentrations of MPXV DNA even on day 16 after symptom onset 10 . These data are consistent with reports of MPXV shedding from previous outbreaks in humans 12 and experimental studies in animals [13][14][15][16] that consistently show shedding via these excretions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%