2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequent cellular phone use modifies hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis response to a cellular phone call after mental stress in healthy children and adolescents: A pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Athermal EM effects are statistically observable in pituitary glands [23,24]. At this level, one can presume similar effects on hypothalamusthalamus and pineal glands, since they have similar tissue properties [25,26]. These endocrine glands have a vital effect on the hypothalamicpituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis response and the circadian cycle (CC) of the body, respectively.…”
Section: Simulation Outcomes' Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Athermal EM effects are statistically observable in pituitary glands [23,24]. At this level, one can presume similar effects on hypothalamusthalamus and pineal glands, since they have similar tissue properties [25,26]. These endocrine glands have a vital effect on the hypothalamicpituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis response and the circadian cycle (CC) of the body, respectively.…”
Section: Simulation Outcomes' Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hormonal profile of cell phone users, or of people aged from 14 to 60 years living at a distance from 20‐100 to 100‐500 m from a base station, showed a significant effect on the pituitary‐adrenal axis in the form of changes in cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) plasma levels [Eskander et al, ]. Prospective studies of school children (average age 12.5 ± 1.5 years) revealed a change in cortisol saliva after talking 10–20 min on a cell phone (SAR 0.571 ± 0.2 W/kg) compared with the control group [Geronikolou et al, ]. These prospective studies have considered this hormone as a prognostic marker of the endocrine stress response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Widely accepted as being a complex construct, stress, is divided into several stages: i) the stressors which are the event potentially leading to the psycho-physiological features associated with stress, ii) the mediators which can involve the appraisal of, as well as coping with, the stressor, iii) the moderators where this can include the social support being available as well as the personality and resource of the individual, and finally, iv) the stress response itself which includes activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and the sympathetic nervous system ( 3 – 6 ). The physiological response to stress usually involves activation of the HPA axis above the basal level, resulting in increased synthesis and secretion of glucocorticoids (GC) (such as cortisol) as well as activation of the sympathetic nervous system resulting in the secretion of catecholamines (such as adrenalin) ( 7 ). Concerning cancer prognosis, certain psychosocial factors such as little social support and hopelessness were found in many prospective studies and reviews to predict prognosis in cancer, independent of confounders such as cancer stage and treatments ( 1 , 8 , 9 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%