2020
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/6bh82
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequent Assessment of Suicidal Thinking does not Increase Suicidal Thinking: Evidence from a High-Resolution Real-Time Monitoring Study

Abstract: Researchers, clinicians, and patients are increasingly using real-time monitoring methods to understand and predict suicidal thoughts and behaviors. These methods involve frequently assessing suicidal thoughts, but it is unknown if asking about suicide repeatedly is iatrogenic. We tested two questions about this approach: (1) does repeatedly assessing suicidal thinking over short periods of time increase suicidal thinking? (2) is more frequent assessment of suicidal thinking associated with more severe suicida… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A growing number of suicide researchers (e.g., Coppersmith et al, 2020; DelPozo-Banos et al, 2021; Kaurin, Wright, Hallquist et al, 2020; O’Connor et al, 2018) post a version of their manuscript online, prior to peer review, known as a preprint (commonly posted on PsyArXiv for psychology, SocArXiv for sociology, MedArXiv for clinical articles, etc.). This is because preprints increase access to research beyond barriers of publishers’ paywalls and the successive upload of revised manuscript versions transparently shows the evolution of an article.…”
Section: Implementing Open Science Practices Into New Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing number of suicide researchers (e.g., Coppersmith et al, 2020; DelPozo-Banos et al, 2021; Kaurin, Wright, Hallquist et al, 2020; O’Connor et al, 2018) post a version of their manuscript online, prior to peer review, known as a preprint (commonly posted on PsyArXiv for psychology, SocArXiv for sociology, MedArXiv for clinical articles, etc.). This is because preprints increase access to research beyond barriers of publishers’ paywalls and the successive upload of revised manuscript versions transparently shows the evolution of an article.…”
Section: Implementing Open Science Practices Into New Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some studies find iatrogenic effects of repeatedly being asked to report on symptoms (e.g., alcohol abuse; [37]), other research finds evidence for clinical improvement (e.g., depressive symptoms; [38]). The vast majority of research, however, finds no evidence for symptom reactivity in clinical AA studies (e.g., pain complaints; [39] or suicidal ideation; [40]).…”
Section: The Reduction Of Retrospective Biasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, EMA studies assess the participants' psychological state repeatedly across multiple days raising the issue of measurement reactivity. However, previous EMA studies have provided no evidence for measurement reactivity with regard to mood, craving, body image, and suicidal thoughts (Coppersmith, 2020 ; De Vuyst, Dejonckheere, Van der Gucht, & Kuppens, 2019 ; Heron & Smyth, 2013 ; Hufford, Shields, Shiffman, Paty, & Balabanis, 2002 ; Rowan et al, 2007 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%