2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2020.109202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency weighted H2 optimization of multi-mode input shaper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the main contribution of this paper lies in involving a distributed delay instead of the standard lumped delay in the harmonics compensation. This research direction builds up on the results of the broader authors team gained from the application of distributed delay in input shaping [18], [19], [20], [21] and vibration control, [22], [23], [24]. The main benefit of involving the distributed delay stems from the retarded spectral features at the high-frequency range.…”
Section: B Distributed Delays In Control and Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the main contribution of this paper lies in involving a distributed delay instead of the standard lumped delay in the harmonics compensation. This research direction builds up on the results of the broader authors team gained from the application of distributed delay in input shaping [18], [19], [20], [21] and vibration control, [22], [23], [24]. The main benefit of involving the distributed delay stems from the retarded spectral features at the high-frequency range.…”
Section: B Distributed Delays In Control and Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical scenarios include, for example, a rigid body system, flexible load with one or several dominant bending modes, friction-dominant system, unbalanced rotor system etc. The setup proved to be a valuable benchmark problem for the evaluation of various methods from the field of mechatronics, including modelling, identification, and feedback control design [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Flexible Arm Benchmark Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desde então vários shapers foram propostos e aplicados [Kasprowiak et al 2022, Mohammed et al 2020, partindo da versão mais simples com apenas dois sinais (Zero Vibration ZV), também denominado posicast de meio ciclo. Versões mais robustas à incertezas paramétricas como o Zero Vibration Derivative (ZVD) foram comparadas em [Singhose et al 1995] e estratégias adaptativas como em [Dhame and Jayasuriya 2003] e de identificac ¸ão de frequências [Chatlatanagulchai et al 2015, Chu and Hu 2016, Goubej et al 2020 foram combinadas nesta mesma perspectiva de agregac ¸ão de insensibilidade paramétrica e reprojeto em tempo de execuc ¸ão. Não identificou-se contudo aplicac ¸ões do input shaping em sistemas de suspensão de máquinas agrícolas ou de seus implementos, como é o caso de barras de pulverizac ¸ão.…”
Section: Introduc ¸ãOunclassified