Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4901955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency-swept time-reversed ultrasonically encoded optical focusing

Abstract: A technique to rapidly scan an optical focus inside a turbid medium is attractive for various biomedical applications. Time-reversed ultrasonically encoded (TRUE) optical focusing has previously demonstrated light focusing into a turbid medium, using both analog and digital devices. Although the digital implementation can generate a focus with high energy, it has been time consuming to scan the TRUE focus inside a sample. Here, by sweeping the frequencies of both ultrasound and light, we demonstrate a multiple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only difference is that the PBR of the focus would be much lower when focusing light inside tissue, compared with when focusing light in between two pieces of tissue, because the speckle size inside tissue is much smaller than that between two pieces of tissue. When focusing light inside tissue, this small-speckle-size-induced low PBR is a major challenge to all acoustic-wave-guided wavefront shaping techniques [4,15,19,2431,41,47,5860]. This low PBR is a separate problem to solve that is beyond the scope of this work, which concentrates on improving the speed, rather than improving the PBR of TRUE focusing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The only difference is that the PBR of the focus would be much lower when focusing light inside tissue, compared with when focusing light in between two pieces of tissue, because the speckle size inside tissue is much smaller than that between two pieces of tissue. When focusing light inside tissue, this small-speckle-size-induced low PBR is a major challenge to all acoustic-wave-guided wavefront shaping techniques [4,15,19,2431,41,47,5860]. This low PBR is a separate problem to solve that is beyond the scope of this work, which concentrates on improving the speed, rather than improving the PBR of TRUE focusing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To take full advantage of the SLM and further improve the speed of ultrasound-guided DOPC, we develop a double-exposure binary wavefront measurement method. The speed of our system is one to two orders of magnit ude higher than those of previous ultrasound-guided DOPC systems [16,2431], and our method achieves the fastest light focusing inside a scattering medium among all the digital wavefront shaping methods developed to date [36]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16bits) needed to be utilized and there was heavy load for data transfer. 49,56,[58][59][60] Besides, the shot noise inside raw signal with high background portion sharply reduced the SNR of collected light¯eld. To addressing these challenges, Liu et al in 2016 proposed a novel lock-in camera-based digital TRUE system.…”
Section: Dopcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even worse, phase-shifting holography needs to record and transfer at least four frames of images to calculate the phase map on a computer, so the speed of wavefront determination is severely limited by the low frame rates of conventional cameras and the heavy load during data transfer. When averaging is needed, even more frames need to be recorded and transferred, so it takes seconds to acquire a phase map (with 1920 × 1080 pixels) before time-reversed focusing can be performed in previous works [5,6,11,12]. To apply this technique in vivo , systems with higher speeds are strongly desired to accommodate the fast speckle decorrelation (on a time scale from 0.1 ms to 1 ms) primarily due to blood flow [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%