2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29321-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency-specific brain network architecture in resting-state fMRI

Abstract: The analysis of brain function in resting-state network (RSN) models, ascertained through the functional connectivity pattern of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI), is sufficiently powerful for studying large-scale functional integration of the brain. However, in RSN-based research, the network architecture has been regarded as the same through different frequency bands. Thus, here, we aimed to examined whether the network architecture changes with frequency. The blood oxygen level-d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to relatively demanding computational approaches, encompassing both data extraction and subsequent analyses of coordinated functioning, obtaining patterns of functional connectivity is not straightforward and can easily become ambiguous. In neuroscience, where the greatest progress in this field has been made, it has become evident that objectively assessing connectivity patterns is challenged by various objective reasons tied to experimental variations and computational methodologies, such as thresholding techniques [82][83][84], techniques used for data pooling [85,86], number of sensors used to record brain activity [87,88], and the selection of frequency intervals [89,90]. Most importantly, similar issues are witnessed in the network-based analysis of spatiotemporal cellular dynamics in islets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to relatively demanding computational approaches, encompassing both data extraction and subsequent analyses of coordinated functioning, obtaining patterns of functional connectivity is not straightforward and can easily become ambiguous. In neuroscience, where the greatest progress in this field has been made, it has become evident that objectively assessing connectivity patterns is challenged by various objective reasons tied to experimental variations and computational methodologies, such as thresholding techniques [82][83][84], techniques used for data pooling [85,86], number of sensors used to record brain activity [87,88], and the selection of frequency intervals [89,90]. Most importantly, similar issues are witnessed in the network-based analysis of spatiotemporal cellular dynamics in islets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, much of the important information of rsfMRI activity resides in low frequencies (Biswal et al, 1995;Kalcher et al, 2014;Van Dijk et al, 2010). Although recent studies have increasingly emphasized the presence of rich information in higher frequencies within rsfMRI, challenging our prior understanding (Chen & Glover, 2015;DeRamus et al, 2021;Kajimura et al, 2023), the low frequencies contribute the greatest power it seems. Based on these two points, the method proposed here that allows us to select smaller window sizes for SWPC while improving its estimation can be quite useful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 45 , 46 Contradictory evidence exists regarding spatial patterns of functional networks, where some results suggest that functional connectivity patterns are similar across the frequency range 43 , 45 while other findings indicate compositional differences between frequency bands. 47 , 48 While our study was underpowered to properly investigate frequency subbands and multiband acquisition protocols are preferred, future studies could investigate whether the associations between functional connectivity and distinct cognitive functions differ across the frequency spectrum and what the behavioural consequences of these differences might be to further improve our understanding of brain function in health and disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%